Barack and David sitting in a tree

Kiss kiss kiss hug hug hug .... Oh you touched David's ding ding dong.... Obama's new Lover Presenting David Cameron who will replace Reggie Loves...Obama announces his "special " relationship like his special relationship with Larry Sinclair.
We dont want to leave out Michelle and her new Girl friend Samantha. After all, they kiss kiss too and had sushi.

Vote for Leah Lax  visit www.LeahLax.com

Starstruck David Cameron's embarrassing fawning over Barack Obama and his 'beautiful words'

By Toby Harnden
PUBLISHED: 19:32 EST, 15 March 2012 | UPDATED: 20:28 EST, 15 March 2012
What David Cameron described as his 'guys night out' watching basketball with President Barack Obama in the swing state of Ohio was cheesy and embarrassing enough. But has there ever been a speech given by a British prime minister that was quite as cringeworthy as Cameron's 'toast' to Obama at last night's State Dinner?

In the video below, Cameron starts speaking at the 8:20 point and almost immediately hails Obama's 'strong and beautiful words'. It's downhill from there.

He takes a cheap shot at Richard Nixon - the easiest possible target in front of a gathering of Obamaphiles - and his own Tory predecessor Ted Heath. He makes corny jokes about cricket and Watergate ('call in the plumbers' - Geddit?) and then lauds Obama's 'strength, moral authority and wisdom'. No mention of Ronald Reagan or Margaret Thatcher.
Scroll down for video

Gushing: During his speech at last night's state dinner, Cameron lauds Obama's 'strength, moral authority and wisdom'

Then comes what must surely be one of the most obsequious things Obama - who is well used to adulation - has ever heard. Obama, says Cameron 'has pressed the reset button on the moral authority of the entire free world'.

What? Pass the sickbag. Whichever way you look at it, that's ridiculous. Under Obama, despite his campaign promises and indeed an executive order when he took office, Guantanamo Bay has remained open. Drone strikes have increased exponentially - it being judged easier to kill suspects than capture and interrogate them. Military trials outside the federal system continue, as does indefinite detention without trial.

More...

• David Cameron and Samantha pay their respects at 9/11 memorial site in NYC

Certainly, Obama has delivered some 'beautiful words' around the world, starting in Berlin before he was even the Democratic nominee and continuing in Cairo. In Strasbourg, he apologised for the times when 'America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive' towards its allies.

But Obama has certainly shown arrogance and dismissiveness towards the UK in a way that President George W. Bush never did. Israel considers the US an unreliable ally under Obama. Iran's green revolutionaries might question Obama's 'moral authority' after he allowed them to be crushed by Tehran's theocratic regime, as might the Syrian rebels and civilians currently dying at the hands of President Bashar Assad.

High praise: Cameron says Obama 'has pressed the reset button on the moral authority of the entire free world'

Then there was this passage, in which Cameron chucks in the names of Rosa Parks and Martin Luther King for no apparent reason at all - other than, presumably and patronisingly, because Obama is black: 'Half a century ago, the amazing courage of Rosa Parks, the visionary leadership of Martin Luther King, and the inspirational actions of the civil rights movement led politicians to write equality into the law and make real the promise of America for all her citizens.

'But in the fight for justice and the struggle for freedom, there is no end, because there is so much more to do to ensure that every human being can fulfill their potential. That is why our generation faces a new civil rights struggle, to seek the prize of the future that is open to every child as never before. Barack has made this one of the goals of his presidency, the goal he's pursuing with enormous courage.'

What on earth is Cameron talking about? Gay marriage? Obama's against that, publicly at least. Healthcare reform? Or maybe it's just what it sounds - utter vacuity.

As I argued in this newspaper piece, Cameron is foolish to have ignored the Republicans during this trip. Mitt Romney, the likely GOP nominee, was in New York yesterday and today and was presumably available for a meeting. Cameron's predecessor Gordon Brown met candidates Obama, Hillary Clinton and John McCain in Washington in April 2008. President Obama met Cameron in London in April 2009 when the Tory was opposition leader.

Chummy: Obama and Cameron sit side-by-side at the state dinner

He only added to this error by his fawning praise of the man he referred to earlier in the day as 'Mr President Barack' - which only reinforces the sense that the UK the much junior partner in the much-vaunted (in the UK) 'special relationship'.

For a British prime minister to align himself with one side in American politics is a rookie error. To do it with the party on the opposite side (supposedly) of the political spectrum is pure folly.

And, of course, 41 of the 364 guests were - surprise, surprise - major Obama fundraisers. The White House drew up the guest list but if there's anyone with backbone in Downing Street (maybe a forlorn hope, I know) there will be a protest about the way Cameron was used to entertain Democratic donors being rewarded for their largesse in an election year.

Come next year, Cameron - assuming he is still in office - may very well find himself having to deal with a President Mitt Romney. If so, the first thing he'll have to do is mend some fences.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2115562/TOBY-HARNDEN-Starstruck-David-Camerons-embarrassing-fawning-Barack-Obama-beautiful-words.html#ixzz1pFa6rJu5

Barack Obama is slam-dunk disqualified

WND EXCLUSIVE

What happened at Obama-no-show trial

Sworn testimony reveals fake Social Security number, other gaps

Published: 7 hours ago

by Jerome R. CorsiEmail | Archive

Jerome R. Corsi, a Harvard Ph.D., has authored many books, including No. 1 N.Y. Times best-sellers "The Obama Nation" and "Unfit for Command." Along with serving as WND's senior staff reporter

Georgia citizens today delivered sworn testimony to a court that Barack Obama is slam-dunk disqualified from having his name on the 2012 presidential ballot in the state, because his father never was a U.S. citizen, which prevents him from qualifying as a “natural-born citizen” as the U.S. Constitution requires for a president.
The historic hearing was the first time that a court has accepted arguments on the merits of the controversy over Obama’s status. His critics say he never met the constitutional requirements to occupy the Oval Office, and the states and Congress failed in their obligations to make sure only a qualified president is inaugurated. His supporters, meanwhile, argue he won the 2008 election and therefore was “vetted” by America.

The hearing was before Judge Michael Malihi of the Georgia state Office of State Administrative Hearings. In Georgia, a state law requires “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”
State law also grants the secretary of state and any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate’s qualifications, the judge determined.
Citizens bringing the complaints include David Farrar, Leah Lax, Thomas Malaren and Laurie Roth, represented by California attorney Orly Taitz, who has handled numerous cases concerning Obama’s eligibility; David Weldon represented by attorney Van R. Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation; and Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, represented by J. Mark Hatfield. Cody Judy is raising a challenge because he also wants to be on the ballot.
Several of the attorneys introduced passages from Obama’s own writings that Barack Obama Sr. was his father. They then introduced evidence that the man never was a U.S. citizen, that he was a citizen of Kenya at the time of junior’s birth and was therefore a subject of the United Kingdom.
His father’s citizenship, they said, precludes him from serving as president, since the Founders required that officer to be a “natural-born citizen,” not just a “citizen.”
The term is not defined in the Constitution, but evidence introduced included a passage from a 1975 Supreme Court opinion that states:”The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”
Weldon explained in his presentation that the 14th Amendment granting citizenship did not redefine Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, which includes the requirement for a president to be a “natural-born citizen.”
The attorney argued also that another later court case referenced citizenship in the dicta, not the central holding in the case, and thus was not controlling.
Many of Irion’s arguments were echoed by Hatfield, a strategy that at least one constitutional expert, Herb Titus, said was sound.
Titus taught constitutional law, common law, and other subjects for nearly 30 years at five different American Bar Association-approved law schools. From 1986 to 1993, he served as the founding dean of the College of Law and Government in Regent University in Virginia Beach, Va. Prior to his academic career, he served as a trial attorney and a special assistant United States attorney with the United States Department of Justice in Washington, D.C., and Kansas City, Mo.
He told WND the fact that Obama’s father was a Kenyan citizen should be sufficient.
“That is much stronger than the question of where he was born,” he said. “That alone is evidence. … They don’t need anything additional.”
Taitz argued multiple prongs of the case: that the birth certificate released by the White House is a forgery; that he probably has had several citizenships, such as when he was listed in Indonesia as an Indonesian citizen; and that he’s been known under the names Obama, Soetoro and Soebarkah.
She also had a private investigator, Susan Daniels, testify that it appears Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security number.
Documents and imaging expert Doug Vogt asserted the birth documentation released by the White House was a creation of a software program and not a scan of any original document. That would mean Obama’s documentation, despite what the White House released in April, is still under wraps.
Obama and his attorney boycotted the proceedings, issuing a letter to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp that the judge was letting attorneys “run amok.” The statement came after Malihi refused to quash a subpoena for Obama’s testimony and his records, which effectively was ignored by the White House.
The judge is expected to review the evidence and make a recommendation to the state whether there is reason to be concerned about Obama’s name on the 2012 ballot.
He apparently will have no defense evidence, but Kemp had warned Obama about that.
Kemp said late last night in a response to a demand from Obama’s attorney that he simply order the hearing stopped.
“Anything you and your client place in the record in response to the challenge will be beneficial to my review of the initial decision; however, if you and your client choose to suspend your participation in the OSAH proceedings, please understand that you do so at your own peril.”

WND reported earlier on the stunning decision from Malihi, who refused to quash the subpoena even after Obama outlined his defense strategy for such state-level challenges, which have erupted in half a dozen or more states already.
“Presidential electors and Congress, not the state of Georgia, hold the constitutional responsibility for determining the qualifications of presidential candidates,” Obama’s lawyer argued. “The election of President Obama by the presidential electors, confirmed by Congress, makes the documents and testimony sought by plaintiff irrelevant.”
But the judge thought otherwise.
“Defendant argues that ‘if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as president of the United States’ to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia. However, defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend,” he wrote in his order.
“Defendant’s motion suggests that no president should be compelled to attend a court hearing. This may be correct. But defendant has failed to enlighten the court with any legal authority,” the judge continued.
“Specifically, defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is ‘unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony … [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party’s preparation or presentation at the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced,’” the judge said.
Jablonski also had argued that the state should mind its own business.
“The sovereignty of the state of Georgia does not extend beyond the limits of the State. … Since the sovereignty of the state does not extend beyond its territorial limits, an administrative subpoena has no effect,” the filing argued.
The image released by the White House in April:

Obama long-form birth certificate released April 27 by the White House

Titus said, “‘Natural born citizen’ in relation to the office of president, and whether someone is eligible, was in the Constitution from the very beginning. Another way of putting it; there is a law of the nature of citizenship. If you are a natural born citizen, you are a citizen according to the law of nature, not according to any positive statement in a Constitution or in a statute, but because of the very nature of your birth and the very nature of nations.”
If you “go back and look at what the law of nature would be or would require … that’s precisely what a natural born citizen is …. is one who is born to a father and mother each of whom is a citizen of the U.S. or whatever other country,” he said.
“Now what we’ve learned from the Hawaii birth certificate is that Mr. Obama’s father was not a citizen of the United States. His mother was, but he doesn’t qualify as a natural born citizen for the office of president.”

The First Fat Lady Michelle O'blubber is ANGRY

Angry Fat Michelle Is Angry That  People View Her as a Angry Black Woman. Wow !  

No one likes you Fat Michelle.

 The First Fat Lady Michelle O'blubber  is ANGRY and that  she is known in the White House for setting policies, sitting in the Presidents meetings, fighting with his staff and forcefully imposing her will on the White House Aides complaining that she is viewed as an Angry Black Woman. Are you an angry Black  drunken Woman also because everyone knows you and Barack have a drinking problem or is it your drug problem? 

What ever  Michelle YOU ARE AN ANGRY BLACK WOMAN! GO GET ANGER MANAGEMENT TREATMENT! You are NOT the President. Act like a First Lady and not a Queen.


By the way she is known to drink Sassy  Bitch Wine! Maybe this is the reason for her mental problems. Life Must Be Hell in the White House With Voodoo Princess Angry Fat Michelle Living There

Michelle Obama: White House Life Is "Hell, I Can't Stand It."

http://chicagoist.com/2010/09/16/michelle_obama_white_house_life.php
White House Photo/Pete Souza

Angry Fat Michelle O'Blubber snapping her fingers at the staff!

At least, that's according to Carla Bruni, wife of French PM President Nicolas Sarkozy. A new book written in collaboration with Bruni claims that when she asked Michelle how living in the White House was, she replied "Don’t ask! It’s hell. I can’t stand it!" The Daily Mail in London was the first to report the statement which supposedly took place this March during the Sarkozy visit to Washington.
As though being watched every second of every day and requiring a full motorcade every time you wanted to leave the house could ever be considered less than awesome. The White House and Michelle have officially denied the statement, and Bruni is distancing herself from it as well. Not that there's no precedent for first ladies not loving the lifestyle at 1600 Pennsylvania - Hillary Clinton discussed life in the White House (with Tyra Banks!) during the '08 campaign for President, calling it "lonely" and isolating.
Despite the official denial, it could very well suck to go from being a relatively unknown private citizen to living in what Truman called "the crown jewel of the American penal system." As much of a privilege it might be to be married to the Leader of the Free World, it also might suck no matter if your mom's there or not.


Michelle and Barack sit next to a voodoo Statue

Voodoo in Obama’s White House

Kurt NimmoInfowars

August 17, 2009

Kristen Atkinson, a blogger over at the Townhall website, has posted an article claiming Marian Robinson, the 72-year old first grandmother who lives at the White House, is practicing Santería, otherwise known as voodoo. A close friend of Michelle Obama says the president became furious at his mother-in-law.

	Obama may be outraged by a voodoo priestess chanting in the White House, but paganism at the highest levels of government is nothing new.

According to Atkinson, Marian Robinson became increasingly frustrated as her husband, Fraser Robinson, was hobbled by multiple sclerosis in the late 1980s, and turned to “Santeria in a desperate hope” to cure him. “Michelle put her foot down when she heard that her mother took her dad to ceremonies where they did spells and trances, and sacrificed animals, chickens and goats I think. But Marian was desperate and kept going anyway, even when her husband was to sick to go with her. I don’t think the president knew anything about this earlier because it was before they met. Michelle and Craig (her brother) wanted to close the book on this and never talked about it again after their father died in 1991.”
Robinson, concerned about her failing health, invited an old friend from Chicago to visit her at the White House and the friend performed a Santeria ceremony in the residence. “No voodoo in the White House. Absolutely. I don’t care what you call it,” Obama allegedly declared.
Obama may be outraged by a voodoo priestess chanting in the White House, but paganism at the highest levels of government is nothing new or particularly shocking.
[efoods]The global elite pulling Obama’s strings are dedicated paganists and their religion is based on the mystery school religions of Sumer and Babylon. “Most modern human beings are convinced that … pagan gods passed into the dustbin of history two millenia ago, but we suspect that this may not be the case. Repeatedly throughout history, the elites of the Great World Empire have been attracted to religious secret societies such as these, which maintain a high regard for the ancient pagans,” write Jerry Russell and Richard Stanley.
A prime example of the global elite’s obsession with the mystery school religions is the Bohemian Grove ritual, where the hand-picked minions of the elite — 1,500 of America’s most influential CEOs, government officials, financiers, industrialists, and media moguls — worship a giant 40-foot owl and sacrifice a mock human being in effigy they call Dull Care. Members include former presidents George W. Bush, his father, Henry Kissinger, and David Rockefeller.
For more on Bohemian Grove and the elite, see the Prison Planet archive.
Another example is Skull and Bones, aka The Order of Death, a secret society that has George W. Bush and John Kerry as members. Skull and Bones features bizarre occult initiation rituals and an obsession with death. Numerous Bonesmen can be traced to positions of enormous influence, including the Federal Reserve, the Council on Foreign Relations, captains of industry, and all branches of the establishment. The secretive gathering at Bohemian Grove is an off-shoot of Skull and Bones.

The British press has exposed the occult activities of Cherie Blair and her famous husband, Tony Blair, the former prime minister. In 2004 the London Times reported on the fact that Tony Blair had made political decisions based on new age readings. “Among the milder activities Cherie Blair is said to have taken jars of her own and her husband’s hair and nail clippings to health guru who ‘dowsed’ the jars by waving a pendulum over them to detect ‘poisons and blockages’ that could affect the Blairs,” Steve Watson wrote for Prison Planet on September 21, 2005.

Obama’s “good luck” charms, including the pagan god Hanuman.

“This all sounds bizarre and incredible, you couldn’t make it up. Yet we have seen again and again how elite figures are obsessed with these kinds of activities,” Watson comments. “It seems that with absolute power comes an urge to tap into the dark side of humanity and any kind of underworld that lies beyond. It is therefore not surprising that our so called leaders and decision makers that have led us into a period of intense conflict and disharmony around the world are the same people who pander to and in many cases engage in such dark occult activities.”
It is also not surprising that Obama’s mother-in-law paraded around the White House with a voodoo priestess, although this may not have anything to do with the elite’s obsession with mystery religions, the occult, secret societies, and The Order of Death.
However, it is suspicious that Obama carries around “charms,” as documented by Time Magazine. One of Obama’s charms happens to be an image of Hanuman, as known as Bajrang Bali, the monkey god and one of the most revered gods in the Hindu religion, the largest pagan religion in the world.
Isn’t it strange that Obama, described ad nauseam as a Christian, would carry around a pagan idol?

Maybe this is why the country is in such bad shape Voodoo Princess Fat Michelle's Mother Marian Robinson said the wrong spell!

Who has the right to scrub the internet on US Supreme Court Opinions? Why it's Homeland Security! And we know who is in charge of that!Secretary Janet Napolitano who is doing a bang up job in giving arms to Hamas and the drug dealers in her fast and fury project. She is fast and fury in the aid of killing Americans.


Vote for Leah Lax and donate at www.leahlax.com and remember you vote Obama out  Secretary Janet Napolitano is out too. Give to Leah at www.leahlax.com

CERTIFIGATE

Eligibility rulings vanish from Net

Online Supreme Court opinions scrubbed in 2008 election runup

---

Posted: October 23, 2011
5:30 pm Eastern By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WND

A New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court has published a report revealing that references to a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the definition of "natural-born citizen" were scrubbed at one of the key online resources for legal documents.
The Minor v. Happersett case is significant because it is one of very few references in the nation's archives that addresses the definition of "natural-born citizen," a requirement imposed by the U.S. Constitution on only the U.S. president.
That case states:

The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."

Jerome Corsi's New York Times best-seller, "Where's the Birth Certificate?", which addresses Obama's Social Security Number and a host of other disputes, is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore
In the dispute over Obama's eligibility, dating back to before his election, it has been argued that the Minor case does not apply. Some have argued that it applies only to voting rights.
But now Leo C. Donofrio, whose original Donofio v. Wells against the New Jersey Secretary of State alleged Obama does not meet the Constitution's Article 2, Section 1 "natural-born citizen" demand for presidents because of his dual citizenship at birth, has released research suggesting that even as Obama was preparing to be the Democratic candidate for president in 2008, someone was scrubbing court records of that case.
"New evidence conclusively establishes that 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions were sabotaged then republished at Justia.com during the runup to the '08 election," he reported

He initially reported several months ago on a few of the adjustments in the text of the Supreme Court opinions at the online resource, "but last week, a third sabotaged case was discovered which led to a thorough examination of all U.S. Supreme Court cases which cite 'Minor v. Happersett' as they appeared on Justia.com between 2006 and the present."

President Obama

Arguably, under the definition in the case, neither candidate in 2008, Democrat Obama nor Republican Sen. John McCain, would be eligible. McCain was born outside of the United States at a U.S. base in the Panama Canal Zone, and Obama's father never was a U.S. citizen.
Donofrio explained in his report that he did not know who made the changes inside the documents purporting to be U.S. Supreme Court opinions, and "the deception might have been undertaken on behalf of either one.
"Regardless of who you supported in 2008, or whether you agree with the assertion of Minor's relevance, every American should be outraged that 25 Supreme Court cases were surgically sabotaged and then passed off to the public as if the tampered versions contained the 'Full Text of Case,'" he wrote.
"This is the very definition of 'Orwellian' Fascism. It's propaganda. And there is no place for it in the United States. The sacrifices for truth and justice which created and have sustained this nation are wantonly debased by the subversive deception emenating from Justia.com servers."
Justia staff did not return a WND message requesting comment.
Donofrio wrote that it's not just a prank-level matter.
"Since Justice placed affirmations on each tampered opinion which state 'Full Text of Case,' personnel may also be guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. 1018 by intentionally passing off tampered versions of U.S. Supreme Court opinions as if they were official versions published by the U.S. Supreme Court."
The public information officer for the U.S. Supreme Court, Kathleen Arberg, declined to respond to a WND call and email query about whether there could be any ramifications from posting an incomplete court document and representing it as the full document.
Among the dozens of examples identified by Donofrio was the Luria case.
The case from 1913 was an appeal out of New York that concluded: "Where a point involving sufficiency of the complaint is not raised and defendant does not challenge the statement of the court that it supposes the point will not be raised, it is too late to raise it in this court.
"This court concurs in the conclusion reached by the district court that the residence in a foreign country of one whose certificate of naturalization was attacked as fraudulent was intended to be and was of a permanent nature and justified the proceeding on the part of the United States to cancel the certificate under § 15 of the Act of June 29, 1906."
Using the online Wayback machine, Donofrio found a 2006 image of the pertinent reference to Minor v. Happersett in the document. The reference is near the highlighted word:


Then Donofrio found a 2008 image of the same page, but the Minor v. Happersett reference had disappeared:


A subsequent image of the same page, from 2010, revealed that the Minor v. Happersett still was gone:


Finally, the current image, as of Friday afternoon, revealed that the reference had been restored:


"We do not know at this point if Justia personnel were behind this or if their site was hacked. That being said, Justia's reaction to my last report (in July) mirrored the deception of the sabotage. Instead of addressing the proof, Justia quietly and with stealth un-scrubbed the evidence without acknowledging or addressing the issue at all. And they placed '.txt robots' on their URLs for the two previously identified cases so the Wayback Machine could no longer provide historical snapshots of those cases as published at Justia," Donofrio explained.
He said he found 25 instances of tampering, and in some cases not only was the case scrubbed, the numerical citation also was taken out.
"The reality that both candidates eligibility was questionable according to Minor v. Happersett appears to have been known and handled by somebody's legal team. However, Justia CEO Tim Stanley was associated with 'Obama For America 2008,'" he wrote.
He said the case should have been used to prevent the outcome of the 2008 election.
"McCain clearly does not meet the definition since he was born in Panama. And since Obama's father was never a U.S. citizen, the current POTUS doesn't meet the Supreme Court's definition of a natural-born citizen either. Minor v. Happersett has, therefore, been the subject of an intense disinformation campaign. Falsehoods about the case have been widely spread," he said.
He said the most common are that Minor was a voting rights case and is not binding on citizenship issues, or that it was overruled.
But he said both criticisms are false.
Donofrio explained that the pattern of sabotage was consistent: The original documents included the Minor reference and subsequent copies did not.
"Some cases scrubbed the words 'Minor v. Happersett' every time they appeared, and some left it in one time, but removed it in other places. References to The Slaughterhouse Cases, Scott v. Sandford, and Osborn v. Bank of United States (citizenship cases which prove troublesome for Obama's eligibility) were also scrubbed along with full sentences from majority opinions (as was done in Pope v. Williams), and dissents (as was done in U.S. v. Wong Km Ark). The scrubbing was surgically precise as to the issue of POTUS eligibility. The Wayback Machine snapshots prove that the tampering stayed in effect through the final snapshots taken in 2010.
"This tampering happened at Justia.com. That is a fact. The questions which need to be answered now are who ordered it and who carried out the subversive plot," he wrote.
Dianna Cotter wrote in the Portland Civil Rights Examiner: "This was done in these specific cases in order to prevent their being found by Internet researchers long before anyone had even begun to look for them, even before Obama would win the Democratic nomination at the DNC Convention in Denver, Colo., in August '08. This is premeditation and intent to deceive."
She noted that attorneys working on arguments always would return to the originals from the Supreme Court, "but 99.99 percent of the population has no access to dusty law texts or expensive legal research services such as Lexis and Westlaw.
"The manipulation at Justia.com diluted the importance of Minor by killing the citations in Supreme Court cases spanning over 100 years. Since Google most often returns Justia.com's version of the case being searched for as the first or second hit, Justia's version of Supreme Court opinions are most influential in the blogosphere's forums and comments. Erasing those citations and text on the Internet literally erases the importance of Minor and its precedents to millions of Americans otherwise unlikely to ever step into physical Law Library," she wrote.
There have been multiple court and other challenges to Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office. Essentially they have argued that he either isn't eligible because he wasn't born in Hawaii as he's said, or that he was never qualified because his father was a Kenyan citizen, giving Barack Obama dual citizenship (the U.S. and the United Kingdom) at his birth. Those people argue that the Founders, with their requirement that the president be a "natural-born citizen," disqualified dual citizens.
The White House in April released an image of a "Certificate of Live Birth" from the state of Hawaii in support of Obama's claim that he was born in the state. However, many computer, imaging, document and technology experts have stated it appears to be a forgery.
The image:

Obama long-form birth certificate released April 27 by the White House

Read more: Eligibility rulings vanish from Net http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=358645#ixzz1bhb511CK

Steve Jobs Biography Reveals He Told Obama, 'You're Headed For A One-Term Presidency'

First Posted: 10/20/11 06:07 PM ET Updated: 10/20/11 09:26 PM ET  

In one of the most hotly-anticipated biographies of the year, "Steve Jobs," author Walter Isaacson reveals that the Apple CEO offered to design political ads for President Obama's 2012 campaign despite being highly critical of the administration's policies and that Jobs refused potentially life-saving surgery on his pancreatic cancer because he felt it was too invasive. Nine months later, he got the operation but it was too late.
Those are just some of the tidbits about Jobs' life revealed in the upcoming biography, a copy of which was obtained by The Huffington Post. The publication date of the official biography of the notoriously-secretive Apple co-founder was pushed up after his death in October. "I wanted my kids to know me," Isaacson quoted Jobs as saying in their final interview. "I wasn't always there for them and I wanted them to know why and to understand what I did."
Among other details unearthed in the book on the notoriously-secretive Apple co-founder:
Jobs' Meeting With Obama
Jobs, who was known for his prickly, stubborn personality, almost missed meeting President Obama in the fall of 2010 because he insisted that the president personally ask him for a meeting. Though his wife told him that Obama "was really psyched to meet with you," Jobs insisted on the personal invitation, and the standoff lasted for five days. When he finally relented and they met at the Westin San Francisco Airport, Jobs was characteristically blunt. He seemed to have transformed from a liberal into a conservative.
"You're headed for a one-term presidency," he told Obama at the start of their meeting, insisting that the administration needed to be more business-friendly. As an example, Jobs described the ease with which companies can build factories in China compared to the United States, where "regulations and unnecessary costs" make it difficult for them.
Jobs also criticized America's education system, saying it was "crippled by union work rules," noted Isaacson. "Until the teachers' unions were broken, there was almost no hope for education reform." Jobs proposed allowing principals to hire and fire teachers based on merit, that schools stay open until 6 p.m. and that they be open 11 months a year.
Aiding Obama's Reelection Campaign
Jobs suggested that Obama meet six or seven other CEOs who could express the needs of innovative businesses -- but when White House aides added more names to the list, Jobs insisted that it was growing too big and that "he had no intention of coming." In preparation for the dinner, Jobs exhibited his notorious attention to detail, telling venture capitalist John Doerr that the menu of shrimp, cod and lentil salad was "far too fancy" and objecting to a chocolate truffle dessert. But he was overruled by the White House, which cited the president's fondness for cream pie.
Though Jobs was not that impressed by Obama, later telling Isaacson that his focus on the reasons that things can't get done "infuriates" him, they kept in touch and talked by phone a few more times. Jobs even offered to help create Obama's political ads for the 2012 campaign. "He had made the same offer in 2008, but he'd become annoyed when Obama's strategist David Axelrod wasn't totally deferential," writes Isaacson. Jobs later told the author that he wanted to do for Obama what the legendary "morning in America" ads did for Ronald Reagan.
Bill Gates And Steve Jobs
Bill Gates was fascinated by Steve Jobs but found him "fundamentally odd" and "weirdly flawed as a human being," and his tendency to be "either in the mode of saying you were shit or trying to seduce you."
Jobs once declared about Gates, "He'd be a broader guy if he had dropped acid once or gone off to an ashram when he was younger."
After 30 years, Gates would develop a grudging respect for Jobs. "He really never knew much about technology, but he had an amazing instinct for what works," he said. But Jobs never reciprocated by fully appreciating Gates' real strengths. "Bill is basically unimaginative and has never invented anything, which is why I think he's more comfortable now in philanthropy than technology. He just shamelessly ripped off other people's ideas."
Meeting His Biological Father
Jobs, who was adopted, was a customer at a Mediterranean restaurant north of San Jose without realizing that it was owned by his biological father -- from whom he was estranged. He eventually met his real Dad -- "It was amazing," he later said of the revelation. "I had been to that restaurant a few times, and I remember meeting the owner. He was Syrian. Balding. We shook hands."
Nevertheless Jobs still had no desire to see him. "I was a wealthy man by then, and I didn't trust him not to try to blackmail me or go to the press about it."
Anticipating An Early Death
Jobs once told John Sculley, who would later become Apple's CEO and fire Jobs, that if he weren't working with computers, he could see himself as a poet in Paris. "Jobs confided in Sculley that he believed he would die young, and therefore he needed to accomplish things quickly so that he would make his mark on Silicon Valley history. "We all have a short period of time on this earth," he told the Sculleys. "We probably only have the opportunity to do a few things really great and do them well. None of us has any idea how long we're gong to be here nor do I, but my feeling is I've got to accomplish a lot of these things while I'm young."

* * * * * For his first interview about the book, Isaacson talked to "60 Minutes" for the Sunday, Oct. 23 episode, telling host Steve Kroft that he was shocked about Jobs's decision to initially skip surgery for his pancreatic cancer -- that such a genius could make such a wrong decision about his own health.
"I've asked [Jobs why he didn't get an operation then] and he said, 'I didn't want my body to be opened ... I didn't want to be violated in that way,' said Isaacson.
"I think that he kind of felt that if you ignore something, if you don't want something to exist, you can have magical thinking. ... We talked about this a lot," he told Kroft. "He wanted to talk about it, how he regretted it. ... I think he felt he should have been operated on sooner."

Obama's sick poetry

December 29, 2010

Early Obama Poem Shows Davis's Hand

By Jack Cashill

Many thanks to my correspondent, "Mr. Southwest," for surfacing an early and revealing Obama poem that I had heretofore not seen. 

The unnamed poem, which I will call "Forgotten," was unearthed for a lengthy March 2008 article in Vanity Fair by the magazine's national editor, Todd Purdum.  It reads as follows:

I saw an old, forgotten man

On an old, forgotten road.

Staggering and numb under the glare of the

Spotlight. His eyes, so dull and grey,

Slide from right to left, to right,

Looking for his life, misplaced in a

Shallow, muddy gutter long ago.

I am found, instead.

Seeking a hiding place, the night seals us together.

A transient spark lights his face, and in my honor,

He pulls out forgotten dignity from under his flaking coat,

And walks a straight line along the crooked world.

When Purdum mentioned the poem to Obama in 2008, Obama told Purdum he had no memory of it.  (By contrast, I can still recite the poem that won a class contest when I was a freshman in high school.)  After Purdum read the poem to Obama, he said, "That's not bad.  I wrote that in high school?"

The poem, which was published in 1978 or 1979 in Obama's high school literary magazine, is not bad at all.  In fact, for a B-minus jock at a Hawaii prep school, the poem is exceptional.  The question that must be asked, however, is the one that Obama himself poses: did he actually write it?

As to the content of the poem, Obama told Purdum, "It sounds in spirit that it's talking a little bit about my grandfather."  Note that the subject of this sentence is "it," not the expected "I."  As he does even in the forward of his acclaimed 1995 memoir, Dreams from My Father, Obama distances himself from his presumed composition.

The "grandfather" Obama refers to here, of course, is his mother's father, Stanley Dunham -- "Gramps," the Willy Loman character with whom Obama lived during much of his adolescence.  If the critics are to be believed -- and they ought not be -- that makes two early Obama poems about his grandfather.

The second poem, called "Pop," was published under Obama's name in the Occidental College literary magazine in 1981.  Rebecca Mead, for instance, writing in the New Yorker, unhesitatingly describes "Pop" as a "loving if slightly jaded portrait of Obama's maternal grandfather."

Obama biographer Remnick makes the same point.  "'Pop,'" he says, as though a given, "clearly reflects Obama's relationship with his grandfather Stanley Dunham."   I could find no mainstream publication that even suggests otherwise. 

The two poems do seem to be about the same person, a world-weary older man with whom the young Obama has a personal relationship.  In "Forgotten," the old man's "eyes, so dull and grey / Slide from right to left, to right."  In "Pop," the "dark, watery eyes" of the old man "glance in different directions." 

The contention that "Pop" is about Dunham, however, leaves a basic question unanswered: why did Obama not call the poem "Gramps"?  If I were to write about the man I knew as "Gramps," I might not necessarily call the poem "Gramps," but I surely would not call it "Pop."  That latter title, after all, has obvious implications. 

The case for Dunham as "Pop" is further weakened by the line in the poem "he switches channels, recites an old poem / He wrote before his mother died."  Although Obama credits Gramps with a little poetic dabbling, Dunham was more of a dirty limerick kind of guy than a real poet. 

As an adolescent, Obama did have a relationship with a real poet: Frank Marshall Davis, a Communist and pornographer but also a skilled writer.  "I could see Frank sitting in his overstuffed chair," Obama remembers in Dreams, "a book of poetry in his lap, his reading glasses slipping down his nose."

Obama continues, "[Frank] would read us his poetry whenever we stopped by his house, sharing whiskey with Gramps out of an emptied jelly jar."  As to the sharing of sage advice, that description fits Davis better than it does Dunham.  "I was intrigued by old Frank," Obama writes in Dreams, "with his books and whiskey breath and the hint of hard-earned knowledge behind the hooded eyes."

A 1987 interview with Davis recorded by the University of Hawaii shows the man Obama describes as "Pop": the drinking, the smoking, the glasses, the twitches, the roaming eyes, the thick neck and broad back.

More to the point, Dunham's mother died when he was eight years old.  Obama knows this.  He says so in Dreams.  Dunham would not have read a poem he wrote "before his mother died."  Davis's mother, however, died when Davis was twenty and had already established himself at Kansas State as a poet of promise. 

On one occasion in Dreams, the teenage Obama stops by Davis's house alone, and there Davis pours him his own shot.  "Pop" seems to memorialize such visits:

Pop takes another shot, neat,

Points out the same amber

Stain on his shorts that I've got on mine, and

Makes me smell his smell, coming

From me ...

A little more obliquely, "Forgotten" captures a comparable experience.

Seeking a hiding place, the night seals us together.

A transient spark lights his face, and in my honor,

He pulls out forgotten dignity from under his flaking coat,

And walks a straight line along the crooked world.

Maya Soetoro-Ng, Obama's half-sister, would describe Davis as her brother's "point of connection, a bridge ... to the larger African-American experience."  Both "Pop" and "Forgotten" would seem to validate that assertion.

Davis, however, may have been more than mere bridge for Obama at this stage of his life.  In my forthcoming book, Deconstructing Obama, I deal with the sexual innuendo implicit in "Pop" as well as the explicit suggestion of paternity in the poem's title.

Here, I will just deal with the issue of authorship.  In reading Davis's poems -- his estate denied me permission to reprint them -- one senses that he is more than just the subject of the two Obama poems.  In fact, "Forgotten" and "Pop" have as much in common with Davis's 1975 poem "To A Young Man" as they do with each other.

All three poems show a comparable sophistication in language and structure.  Written in free verse, each makes ready use of what is called "enjambment" -- that, is the abrupt continuation of a sentence from one line into the next.

Each too deals with an intimate, ambiguous relationship between a young man and his much older mentor.  In all three poems, the Davis character is discussed in the third person.  In "Forgotten," he is the "old, forgotten man."  In "To A Young Man," he is "the old man."  In "Pop," of course, the narrator calls him "Pop."

In "To A Young Man," the Davis character says on one occasion, "Since then I have drunk / Half a hundred liquid years / Distilled / Through restless coils of wisdom."  Note in "Pop" the similar flow of language: "Pop switches channels, takes another / Shot of Seagrams, neat, and asks / What to do with me, a green young man."

There are parallels in word choice as well as in style.  "Neat" means without water or ice. "Neat" and "Distilled" both suggest a kind of alcoholic purity.  The author emphasizes each of these words by isolating it from the flow of the text.

In "Forgotten," the poet suggests a certain purity to alcohol as well, referring to a likely flask pulled from underneath his coast as "forgotten dignity."

At the conclusion of all three poems, the young man receives some useful wisdom from the older man that cuts through the alcoholic haze and adds meaning to the old man's life.

In "Forgotten," "a transient spark" lights the old man's face.  "Pop" also concludes on an upbeat note: "I see my face, framed within / Pop's black-framed glasses / And know he's laughing too."  In the Davis poem "To a Young Man," the old man "turned / His hammered face / To the pounding stars / Smiled / Like the ring of a gong."

Curiously, Obama's "Pop" reads more like the Davis poem than it does Obama's earlier poem.  In "Pop" and "To A Young Man," for instance, the older character speaks to the young man, and he does so without benefit of quotation marks.  More consequentially, each of these two poems has a leaner style than "Forgotten" and a whiff of cynicism about it.

The young man of "Pop" dismisses the old man's wisdom as a mere "spot" in his brain, "something / that may be squeezed out, like a / Watermelon seed between / Two fingers."  Comparably, the old man in the Davis poem "walked until / On the slate horizon / He erased himself."  Whether "squeezed out" or "erased" from the young man's consciousness, the older character understands just how tenuous is his hold on the lad.

This is more hunch than science, but I suspect that as a reward for the young Obama's friendship, Davis may well have slipped this "green young man" a poem or two for publication.  Nowhere else in his unaided oeuvre, such as it is, does Obama show the language control he does in "Pop" or "Forgotten."

Such an everyday scam would not have seemed unethical to an old Communist used to the "flim and flam" (Pop) of a "crooked world" (Forgotten) where "one plus one" does not necessarily make "two or three or four" (To A Young Man). 

Trained to believe that nothing adds up and the deck is stacked against him, Obama has seemed from the beginning entirely comfortable with a counterfeit literary career.

Signed copies of Deconstructing Obama can be pre-ordered at Cashill.com.

on "Early Obama Poem Shows Davis's Hand"

Obama's own body guard doesn't trust him

A former Secret Service agent who vowed to take a bullet for Presidents Obama and Bush is now trying to take Benjamin Cardin’s Senate seat.

Daniel Bongino spent 12 years with the Secret Service before he resigned in May to launch a Senate campaign to challenge the Maryland Democrat.

Bongino, 36, who is running as a Republican, told Fox News this week that his Secret Service experience qualifies him to handle the rough-and-tumble of the upper chamber.

“That job is high stress, high octane all the time and they force leadership on you,” he explained. “They don’t tolerate fools…If you don’t make it, you’re broken pretty quickly.”

Bongino spent three years protecting Bush and two years for Obama. He says Obama was a “wonderful guy” and that his political ideological differences with him aren’t personal.

But Bongino’s mission to defeat Cardin won’t be easy.

The freshman senator had a 48 percent overall approval rating in May 2010, according to the Washington Post. But congressional approval hit a new low at 12 percent, according to an Associated Press-GFK poll last month – a figure that Bongino will likely try to seize on.

Cardin’s camp, however, isn’t showing any signs of worry.

“The senator looks forward to having a debate about the issues with whoever the Republican nominee will be in 2012,” Cardin campaign spokeswoman Shelly Hettleman told FoxNews.com.

One of the issues that most certainly will be debated is Maryland’s new law offering in-state tuition breaks to certain illegal immigrants. The law was suspended last summer after opponents collected tens of thousands of signatures to force the issue onto the 2012 ballot for a referendum.

Bongino, whose wife legally emigrated from Colombia to the United States, said it’s not an immigration issue.

“It’s an issue about the law,” he said, comparing the process of obtaining citizenship to joining a club.

“We have rules,” he said. “Is citizenship worth something or is it now? Well it is worth something. It’s worth fighting for.”

Bongino said his grandfather fought in World War II and his uncle, who died fighting in the Vietnam War, was awarded the Bronze Star for valor.

“People fought and died for this country. It’s worth something,” he said. “This is our club. All we’re asking, just follow the rules. My wife did. It’s not complicated. It was a touching moment to watch her pledge allegiance to our flag.”

Video: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/10/01/obamas-former-bodyguard-seeks-to-unseat-democratic-senator/?intcmp=obinsite#ixzz1ZZzIYq7g
 

Obama's drunken Uncle may go free on executive order

Rep. King Upset With Amnesty for Obama Uncle

Saturday, 10 Sep 2011 11:13 AM

By Amy Woods

Read more on Newsmax.com: Rep. King Upset With Amnesty for Obama Uncle
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!

An incensed congressman from Iowa wants the House Judiciary Committee to subpoena President Barack Obama’s recently arrested uncle, according to a statement issued by Rep. Steve King.

King also renewed his urgent calls for congressional hearings into Obama’s new program granting amnesty to those in the country illegally.

“On Aug. 29, Congressman King suggested that drunken ‘Uncle Omar’ Obama could be the first beneficiary of the president’s new Executive Amnesty for Illegal Aliens program,” communications director John Kennedy said in a press release.

“With today’s revelations, it appears that Congressman King’s suspicions were correct, and that the Obama administration may have used the new rules to grant amnesty to the president’s uncle.”

King issued an official statement Friday in the wake of media reports that Obama’s uncle, Omar Onyango Obama, was released from the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. “Uncle Omar” was being held subject to a 1992 deportation order, which was uncovered following his arrest on suspicion of driving under the influence, driving to endanger, and failing to use a turn signal, according to the press release.

In his statement, King said, “President Obama's uncle, ‘Uncle Omar,’ has been picked up for drunken driving with almost twice the blood-alcohol level that is allowable by law in Massachusetts,” the statement read. “It’ll be the third time that he’s been interdicted with regard to being an illegal immigrant. He’s twice before been adjudicated for deportation, this time Immigration and Customs Enforcement just released him, after they had him in custody, as if he’s not going to be a danger to our society.

“The special privileges for the president’s family who are illegal immigrants, this is the second one,” King continued in the statement. “His ‘Aunt Zeituni’ was also picked up as an illegal immigrant and finally granted an asylum by ICE, by the Department of Homeland Security. We need to have Congressional hearings into favorite treatment of the White House.

"This executive amnesty that the president has ordered, that they’re not going to enforce immigration law, and who pops up first? Drunken ‘Uncle Omar.’ I want to subpoena drunken ‘Uncle Omar’ to come into the House Judiciary Committee along with his attorney, who’s the same attorney that President Obama’s ‘Aunt Zeituni’ had that got her asylum.”

The statement concluded, “We must enforce our immigration laws, and we must enforce those immigration laws equally across all society. Justice has got to be blind, it can’t play favorites, and I want to have hearings in the House Judiciary Committee over drunken ‘Uncle Omar.’ ”

The “Uncle Omar” controversy marks the second time a relative of Obama’s has appeared to benefit from preferential treatment, the press release said. In 2010, Zeituni Onyango, the president’s aunt, had a deportation order overturned.

Obama's Tra La La and his Ding Ding Dong

When I think about Chris Matthews and his comment on Obama what comes to my mind is a song that describes the feeling coming up Chris Matthews leg called The Ding Dong Song by Gunther and the Sunshine Girls.



With Obama's "special" friendship with Chris Matthews and Reggie Love I guess Michelle watches all this. Maybe this is why Obama is an alcoholic he cant get others to touch his" tra la la" his "ding ding dong"!


MEDIA MATTERS

Poll reveals Dems have big, powerful best friend

Even independents, by 3-1 margin, say no question who is in the tank

Posted: September 06, 2011
8:10 pm EasternBy Bob Unruh


Editor's note: This is another in a series of "WND/WENZEL POLLS" conducted exclusively for WND by the public-opinion research and media consulting company Wenzel Strategies.




Chris Mathews said he got a "tingle" up his leg watching Barack Obama. Other interviewers routinely hand him softball questions to lob to his constituency and the results are not lost on the American public.
A new poll now reveals that by a nearly 2-1 margin Americans believe that the national news media favor the Democratic Party over the GOP. The bias is clear even to Democrats themselves, because one in five who self-identified with the party admit they are the media's favorite.
The results come from new scientific telephone survey of nearly l,100 respondents conducted Aug. 20-22 with a margin of error of plus or minus 2.93 percentage points. It was done by Wenzel Strategies.
The poll shows that responding to the question, "If you had to say, which major party do you think the national news media favor in their political coverage?" 46.4 percent identified the Democrats while 23.4 identified the GOP. Another 30.3 percent said neither party.
As America remembers 9/11 this week, resolve to resist creeping Shariah in the U.S. Pamela Geller's "Stop the Islamization of America" tells you how – Order your autographed copy now
"It is not surprising that twice as many respondents believe the news media favors the Democratic Party over the Republican Party in their coverage," said Fritz Wenzel, chief of Wenzel Strategies.
"Among respondents, 46 percent said the Democrats get favored coverage, while 23 percent said the same about Republicans. Another 30 percent said they didn't think either party was favored in news coverage," he said.
"While 74 percent of Republicans said they think Democrats are given favored coverage in the news, it appears Democrats recognize their favored status – just 44 percent said they think Republicans get an edge in news coverage, while the balance said either that Dems get an advantage, or that coverage is fairly balanced," he said.
If the clearest perception of favoritism comes from those on the outside – the independents – then Democrats by a 43-16 percent margin get the best treatment from the news media.
Seventy three percent of the GOP said the Democrats got the best treatment and only 44 percent of the Democrats attributed that to the GOP.
The self-professed "very liberal" said the media treated both parties almost equally, while the "liberal" said the Republican Party was favored 45-22. "Moderates" said the Democrats were favored 38-21 and "conservatives" said the Dems had the advantage 56-19. "Very conservative" respondents said the Dems had a 72-12 advantage.
Among racial groups, only "Asian/other" said the GOP had the advantage, but there was no region in the nation where respondents largely believed that.
Nor was there any income level at which respondents mostly believed the Democrats were not getting favored treatment.


Read more: Poll reveals Dems have big, powerful best friend http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=340305#ixzz1XILd441V