Showing posts with label Obama Excuses. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama Excuses. Show all posts

Thursday, November 17, 2011

If you missed I Listened America

If you missed the Leah Lax 4 President Show I listened America
Here is Thursday November 17 2011

Leah Lax explains why this is not and never
has been a Christian Country like many of
the Republicans Candidates and
Tea Party claim America is.Our Founding
Fathers like Jefferson, Madison, Washington,and
 Hamilton   made sure this is a country that
separated religion from government. Religion
should not be used to rule government or the
lives of  We the People.

Listen to internet radio with LeahLax4 President on Blog Talk Radio

Friday, October 28, 2011

Obama's 2012 run to be non-starter








CERTIFIGATE

Obama's 2012 run to be non-starter

Lawsuits seeking to stop Democrats from certifying candidate's qualified


Posted: October 27, 2011
10:30 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WN
D

Just when the White House probably thought those pesky lawsuits seeking a court determination that Barack Obama fails to meet the Constitution's eligibility requirements for a president were finished, something new has appeared on the horizon.
Or in this case, the court docket.
The Liberty Legal Foundation has filed a pair of lawsuits in state and federal courts that don't ask anything about Obama's birth or for any determination from the court about his eligibility. Or his birth certificate, for that matter.
Jerome Corsi's New York Times best-seller, "Where's the Birth Certificate?", which addresses Obama's Social Security Number and a host of other disputes, is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore
Instead, they name the national Democratic Party as a defendant, and ask the court to enjoin officials there from certifying that Obama is eligible for the office for the 2012 election.
"This complaint does not request or require this court to find that President Obama is not qualified to hold the office of president of the United States. Instead, this complaint is directed toward defining the term 'natural-born citizen' under the Constitution of the United States, and toward negligence or intentional misrepresentations of the Democratic Party.
"This complaint requests this court to affirm the Supreme Court's definition of 'natural-born citizen' as 'all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens.'"

That definition comes from the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion in Minor v. Happersett from 1875.
"This complaint does not request any injunction against any state or federal government official. Instead this complaint asserts that the private entity, Defendant Democratic Party, intends to act negligently or fraudulently in a manner that will cause irreparable harm to the plaintiffs, to the states, and to the citizens of the United States."
It continues, "Because Mr. Obama has admitted that his father was not a U.S. citizen, and because this fact has been confirmed by the U.S. State Department, any reasonable person with knowledge of these facts would doubt Mr. Obama's constitutional qualifications. Therefore, any representation by the Democratic Party certifying said qualifications would be negligent, absent further evidence verifying Mr. Obama's natural-born status.
"Plaintiffs further request an injunction prohibiting the Democratic Party from making any representation to any state official asserting, implying, or assuming that Mr. Obama is qualified to hold the office of president, absent a showing by the party sufficient to prove that said representation is not negligent."
Van Irion, lead counsel for Liberty Legal Foundation, told WND that one lawsuit was filed in federal court in Arizona to focus on the question of defining the term "natural-born citizen" under the Constitution.
"We picked the Arizona court for several reasons, but the main one being that it is part of the 9th Circuit. The 9th Circuit has indicated in dicta that an FEC-registered presidential candidate would have standing for this type of suit," he said. The organization is working with John Dummett, a Liberty Legal Foundation member who is a candidate for the office of president in the 2012 election.
Irion said the other lawsuit was filed in state court in Tennessee.
"The focus of the state-court suit is to prevent certification to the Tennessee secretary of state. This suit puts greater emphasis on the negligent misrepresentation/fraud aspects of a certification from the DNC. It includes more facts regarding Obama's Indonesian dual citizenship and fraudulent Social Security Number," he said.
Other lawsuits also are planned, he said.
Irion said that an injunction obtained through the legal actions would deprive Obama of Democrat Party certification.
"Without such certification from the party, Obama will not appear on any ballot in the 2012 general election," his organization said in an announcement about the cases.
"Neither lawsuit discusses Obama's place of birth or his birth certificate. These issues are completely irrelevant to the argument. LLF's lawsuit simply points out that the Supreme Court has defined 'natural-born citizen' as a person born to two parents who were both U.S. citizens at the time of the natural-born citizen's birth. Obama's father was never a U.S. citizen. Therefore, Obama can never be a natural-born citizen. His place of birth is irrelevant," the group said.
"LLF has learned that all states rely upon the truthfulness of representations made by the political parties that their candidates are qualified to hold the federal office for which they are nominated. By naming the National Democratic Party as the defendant LLF not only targets the entity responsible for vetting the Democratic candidate, LLF also avoids taking on any state or federal government.
"The Democratic Party is a private entity, without any government immunities or government procedural advantages," the group said.
LLF also reported it learned that presidential candidates that are registered with the Federal Election Commission have standing to ask a court to keep another candidate off the ballot. Consequently LLF partnered with FEC-registered Dummett, a conservative Republican who believes that the Constitution should be followed.
While WND has reported that Maricopa, Ariz., County Sheriff Joe Arpaio has launched a formal law enforcement investigation that Obama may submit fraudulent documentation to be put on the state's election ballot in 2012, there also are other developments, too.
WND also has reported on an investigation that revealed a major online court opinion resource, Justia.com, allegedly edited references to the Minor v. Happersett court decision from dozens on documents it posted online.
The issue developed when a Leo Donofrio, a New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court, published a report revealing that references to a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the definition of "natural-born citizen" were altered at Justia.com.
The Minor v. Happersett case is significant because it is one of very few references in the nation's archives that addresses the definition of "natural-born citizen," a requirement imposed by the U.S. Constitution on only the U.S. president.
That case states:
The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."
There have been multiple court and other challenges to Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office. Essentially they have argued that he either isn't eligible because he wasn't born in Hawaii as he's said, or that he was never qualified because his father was a Kenyan citizen, giving Barack Obama dual citizenship (the U.S. and the United Kingdom) at his birth. Those people argue that the Founders, with their requirement that the president be a "natural-born citizen," disqualified dual citizens.
The White House in April released an image of a "Certificate of Live Birth" from the state of Hawaii in support of Obama's claim that he was born in the state. However, many computer, imaging, document and technology experts have stated it appears to be a forgery.
The image that, for the purposes of the new lawsuits, is irrelevant:


Obama long-form birth certificate released April 27 by the White House


Read more: Obama's 2012 run to be non-starter? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=360813#ixzz1c5RVcvQz
 BREAKING NEWS! – Liberty Legal files simultaneous state and federal lawsuits against the Democratic Party, requesting an injunction to prevent the DNC from certifying Obama for the 2012 ballot. Please follow this link to learn more…
  • Have you ever wanted to fight for your Constitutional rights in court, but didn’t know how or couldn’t afford an attorney?
  • Do you feel like your common sense interpretation of the Constitution never seems to have an impact on what Congress does?
  • Are you fed up with the Courts, Congress and the White House ignoring the Constitution, harming the economy and interfering with your daily life?
Then join Liberty Legal Foundation in “marching on the Court”. The third branch of government was established to be a check on both Congress and the White House; allowing any citizen to challenge the Constitutionality of a law. Unfortunately, many Federal Judges have forgotten that their first duty is to the Constitution, not to the other two branches of Federal government. Just as we marched on D.C. demanding that Congress follow the Constitution, we need to march on the Courts. We need to collectively demand that they uphold their oath and declare unconstitutional laws unconstitutional.
Two current class actions are designed to allow any American to join us in our “march” to declare whole categories of Federal action unconstitutional.
The Obamacare Class Action seeks to overturn Wickard v. Filburn, the 1942 Supreme Court precedent that has led to the exponential growth of the Federal government over the past 70 years by interpreting the Commerce Clause so broadly as to leave no limits on Congress. Join tens of thousands of your fellow Americans as a plaintiff today.
The Immigration Class Action seeks a court order that will require the Federal government to enforce existing immigration law and overturn legal precedent that prevents the American citizen’s ability to hold government accountable to enforcing the law. Join as a plaintiff today.
Liberty Legal Foundation is a non-profit organization registered in the state of Tennessee.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

As Perry gives you the song and the dance

As Perry gives you the song and the dance like in the play Chicago he shuffles to the right and then to the left as he dances around the question of Obama's Birth Certificates. Yes Certificates as both the short and long one is a fake, a fraud, phony. But those who are running MUM is the word and refuse to take action the way they were entrusted with their present Jobs. Now if they dance around the Issues now HOW MUCH DIFFERENCE WILL THEY BE FROM OBAMA ONCE THEY ARE ELECTED OTHER THEN THEY HAVE AN NATURAL BORN CERTIFICATE. 

The reason I am running is I had it with the lies, the fighting and the long tales I hear from my representative. I heard for months before the 2010 elections  Obama did this and Obama did that. Hey Candidates who sit in your office taking money from Lobbyist  You talk from both sides of your mouths and do nothing but count how much you can seal from the Tax Payers! 

Perry's fact finding trips:


The Houston Chronicle reports that Perry used at least $294,000 of Texas taxpayers’ money for numerous personal trips, and has no plans to reimburse the state:
At a time when state budget reductions were used to help offset a multibillion-dollar revenue shortfall, taxpayers were billed in excess of $294,000 in security detail expenses for out-of-state trips by Gov. Rick Perry or his wife, according to records released by the Department of Public Safety.
Destinations included the Bahamas in January for a family vacation and trips to Amsterdam, Madrid and New York by Anita Perry alone – visits that Perry spokeswoman Allison Castle said were for economic development.
Perry traveled to locales including New York, Washington, California and Las Vegas for events such as promotion of his anti-Washington book, Fed Up!, speeches, duties related to his then-chairmanship of the Republican Governors Association and meetings with business leaders or potential supporters for his presidential bid.

Wonder what Perry found on these trips?

Michelle Bachman fact finding trips


“That wasn’t the reason I went on the trip,” she told POLITICO when asked if were tied to a potential presidential campaign. “I went on the trip because I’m a member of the Intelligence Committee and we’re very focused on the problems and solutions for the Colombian people and the Mexican people and how our vital US interests are impacted by those two nations.”

 Bachmann says she expects to do more foreign traveling for the committee. She is interested in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq, as well as the recent instability in Libya and Bahrain.

Fact finding is on the Taxpayers dollars not Bachmanns

I am sure with a little research on the net you too could find all the fact finding ( Vacations ) trips these billionaire Candidates took. Meanwhile, America doesn't have a budget and they complain about spending? The Tea Party Republicans support these people and if you say look this is what they do and they are not for We the People they call you names like the Liberals .

I don't support any group other then the American people  as a whole. Not all Democrats are communist/Marxist/socialist/Islamic socialist/ Nazis like the radical Tea Party leaders want you to believe. I believe both sides right and left want a civil war and each is itching for one.

According to NewsMax Perry is dancing around the Birth Certificate issue. Is it a fox trot with Obama or are we doing the twist here. Perry said he will show you his so what I'll post mine even the one from the hospital with my feet prints and my mothers thumb prints. These candidates will promise you anything to get elected .  They are all professional liars!



Obama admits his DOJ Lies

Obama Lies and Lies and Lies

Monday, October 24, 2011

Eligibility rulings vanish from Net

Who has the right to scrub the internet on US Supreme Court Opinions? Why it's Homeland Security! And we know who is in charge of that!Secretary Janet Napolitano who is doing a bang up job in giving arms to Hamas and the drug dealers in her fast and fury project. She is fast and fury in the aid of killing Americans.


Vote for Leah Lax and donate at www.leahlax.com and remember you vote Obama out  Secretary Janet Napolitano is out too. Give to Leah at www.leahlax.com




CERTIFIGATE

Eligibility rulings vanish from Net


Online Supreme Court opinions scrubbed in 2008 election runup



Posted: October 23, 2011
5:30 pm Eastern By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WND


A New Jersey attorney who brought the first legal challenge to Barack Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office to the U.S. Supreme Court has published a report revealing that references to a U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the definition of "natural-born citizen" were scrubbed at one of the key online resources for legal documents.
The Minor v. Happersett case is significant because it is one of very few references in the nation's archives that addresses the definition of "natural-born citizen," a requirement imposed by the U.S. Constitution on only the U.S. president.
That case states:
The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners."
Jerome Corsi's New York Times best-seller, "Where's the Birth Certificate?", which addresses Obama's Social Security Number and a host of other disputes, is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore
In the dispute over Obama's eligibility, dating back to before his election, it has been argued that the Minor case does not apply. Some have argued that it applies only to voting rights.
But now Leo C. Donofrio, whose original Donofio v. Wells against the New Jersey Secretary of State alleged Obama does not meet the Constitution's Article 2, Section 1 "natural-born citizen" demand for presidents because of his dual citizenship at birth, has released research suggesting that even as Obama was preparing to be the Democratic candidate for president in 2008, someone was scrubbing court records of that case.
"New evidence conclusively establishes that 25 U.S. Supreme Court opinions were sabotaged then republished at Justia.com during the runup to the '08 election," he reported
He initially reported several months ago on a few of the adjustments in the text of the Supreme Court opinions at the online resource, "but last week, a third sabotaged case was discovered which led to a thorough examination of all U.S. Supreme Court cases which cite 'Minor v. Happersett' as they appeared on Justia.com between 2006 and the present."

President Obama


Arguably, under the definition in the case, neither candidate in 2008, Democrat Obama nor Republican Sen. John McCain, would be eligible. McCain was born outside of the United States at a U.S. base in the Panama Canal Zone, and Obama's father never was a U.S. citizen.
Donofrio explained in his report that he did not know who made the changes inside the documents purporting to be U.S. Supreme Court opinions, and "the deception might have been undertaken on behalf of either one.
"Regardless of who you supported in 2008, or whether you agree with the assertion of Minor's relevance, every American should be outraged that 25 Supreme Court cases were surgically sabotaged and then passed off to the public as if the tampered versions contained the 'Full Text of Case,'" he wrote.
"This is the very definition of 'Orwellian' Fascism. It's propaganda. And there is no place for it in the United States. The sacrifices for truth and justice which created and have sustained this nation are wantonly debased by the subversive deception emenating from Justia.com servers."
Justia staff did not return a WND message requesting comment.
Donofrio wrote that it's not just a prank-level matter.
"Since Justice placed affirmations on each tampered opinion which state 'Full Text of Case,' personnel may also be guilty of violating 18 U.S.C. 1018 by intentionally passing off tampered versions of U.S. Supreme Court opinions as if they were official versions published by the U.S. Supreme Court."
The public information officer for the U.S. Supreme Court, Kathleen Arberg, declined to respond to a WND call and email query about whether there could be any ramifications from posting an incomplete court document and representing it as the full document.
Among the dozens of examples identified by Donofrio was the Luria case.
The case from 1913 was an appeal out of New York that concluded: "Where a point involving sufficiency of the complaint is not raised and defendant does not challenge the statement of the court that it supposes the point will not be raised, it is too late to raise it in this court.
"This court concurs in the conclusion reached by the district court that the residence in a foreign country of one whose certificate of naturalization was attacked as fraudulent was intended to be and was of a permanent nature and justified the proceeding on the part of the United States to cancel the certificate under § 15 of the Act of June 29, 1906."
Using the online Wayback machine, Donofrio found a 2006 image of the pertinent reference to Minor v. Happersett in the document. The reference is near the highlighted word:


Then Donofrio found a 2008 image of the same page, but the Minor v. Happersett reference had disappeared:


A subsequent image of the same page, from 2010, revealed that the Minor v. Happersett still was gone:


Finally, the current image, as of Friday afternoon, revealed that the reference had been restored:


"We do not know at this point if Justia personnel were behind this or if their site was hacked. That being said, Justia's reaction to my last report (in July) mirrored the deception of the sabotage. Instead of addressing the proof, Justia quietly and with stealth un-scrubbed the evidence without acknowledging or addressing the issue at all. And they placed '.txt robots' on their URLs for the two previously identified cases so the Wayback Machine could no longer provide historical snapshots of those cases as published at Justia," Donofrio explained.
He said he found 25 instances of tampering, and in some cases not only was the case scrubbed, the numerical citation also was taken out.
"The reality that both candidates eligibility was questionable according to Minor v. Happersett appears to have been known and handled by somebody's legal team. However, Justia CEO Tim Stanley was associated with 'Obama For America 2008,'" he wrote.
He said the case should have been used to prevent the outcome of the 2008 election.
"McCain clearly does not meet the definition since he was born in Panama. And since Obama's father was never a U.S. citizen, the current POTUS doesn't meet the Supreme Court's definition of a natural-born citizen either. Minor v. Happersett has, therefore, been the subject of an intense disinformation campaign. Falsehoods about the case have been widely spread," he said.
He said the most common are that Minor was a voting rights case and is not binding on citizenship issues, or that it was overruled.
But he said both criticisms are false.
Donofrio explained that the pattern of sabotage was consistent: The original documents included the Minor reference and subsequent copies did not.
"Some cases scrubbed the words 'Minor v. Happersett' every time they appeared, and some left it in one time, but removed it in other places. References to The Slaughterhouse Cases, Scott v. Sandford, and Osborn v. Bank of United States (citizenship cases which prove troublesome for Obama's eligibility) were also scrubbed along with full sentences from majority opinions (as was done in Pope v. Williams), and dissents (as was done in U.S. v. Wong Km Ark). The scrubbing was surgically precise as to the issue of POTUS eligibility. The Wayback Machine snapshots prove that the tampering stayed in effect through the final snapshots taken in 2010.
"This tampering happened at Justia.com. That is a fact. The questions which need to be answered now are who ordered it and who carried out the subversive plot," he wrote.
Dianna Cotter wrote in the Portland Civil Rights Examiner: "This was done in these specific cases in order to prevent their being found by Internet researchers long before anyone had even begun to look for them, even before Obama would win the Democratic nomination at the DNC Convention in Denver, Colo., in August '08. This is premeditation and intent to deceive."
She noted that attorneys working on arguments always would return to the originals from the Supreme Court, "but 99.99 percent of the population has no access to dusty law texts or expensive legal research services such as Lexis and Westlaw.
"The manipulation at Justia.com diluted the importance of Minor by killing the citations in Supreme Court cases spanning over 100 years. Since Google most often returns Justia.com's version of the case being searched for as the first or second hit, Justia's version of Supreme Court opinions are most influential in the blogosphere's forums and comments. Erasing those citations and text on the Internet literally erases the importance of Minor and its precedents to millions of Americans otherwise unlikely to ever step into physical Law Library," she wrote.
There have been multiple court and other challenges to Obama's occupancy in the Oval Office. Essentially they have argued that he either isn't eligible because he wasn't born in Hawaii as he's said, or that he was never qualified because his father was a Kenyan citizen, giving Barack Obama dual citizenship (the U.S. and the United Kingdom) at his birth. Those people argue that the Founders, with their requirement that the president be a "natural-born citizen," disqualified dual citizens.
The White House in April released an image of a "Certificate of Live Birth" from the state of Hawaii in support of Obama's claim that he was born in the state. However, many computer, imaging, document and technology experts have stated it appears to be a forgery.
The image:


Obama long-form birth certificate released April 27 by the White House


Read more: Eligibility rulings vanish from Net http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=358645#ixzz1bhb511CK

Sunday, October 23, 2011

Muslim women will be enslaved in Libya


Muslim women will be enslaved in Libya thanks to Obama's hand in the war. He knew what he was doing and who was going to be in charge. Don't let the I didn't know fool you! He's a pathological liar.


Vote for Leah Lax in the Primary YES WE CAN GET HIM OUT OF OFFICE. Visit www.leahlax.com Your only hope to remove Obama. Donate to the campaign.

Libyan Leader Declares Nation Islamic, Sharia Law to be Implemented

Sunday, 23 Oct 2011 02:34 PM
 More ways to share...
 
Libya's transitional leader declared his country's liberation Sunday after an 8-month civil war and set out plans for the future with an Islamist tone. The announcement was clouded, however, by international pressure to explain how ousted dictator Moammar Gadhafi had been captured alive days earlier, then ended  up dead from a gunshot to his head shortly afterward.Gadhafi's death in circumstances that are still unclear, and the gruesome spectacle of his body laid out as a trophy in a commercial freezer and on public view, are testing the new Libyan leaders' commitment to the rule of law. Even at the ceremony to declare liberation, a couple speakers in positions of authority essentially said Gadhafi got what he deserved.
But transitional government leader Mustafa Abdul-Jalil, who made the keynote speech, did not mention the events surrounding Gadhafi's end and called on his people to eschew hatred.
"You should only embrace honesty, patience, and mercy," Abdul-Jalil told the crowd at the declaration ceremony in the eastern city of Benghazi, the birthplace of the uprising against Gadhafi. He urged Libyans to reconcile their differences.
And he laid out a vision for the post-Gadhafi future with an Islamist tint, saying Islamic Sharia law would be the "basic source" of legislation and existing laws that contradict the teachings of Islam would be nullified. In a gesture that showed his own piety, he urged Libyans not to express their joy by firing guns in the air, but rather to chant "Allahu Akbar," or God is Great. He then stepped aside from the podium and knelt to offer a brief prayer of thanks.
Using Sharia as the main source of legislation is stipulated in the constitution of neighboring Egypt. Still, Egyptian laws remain largely secular as Sharia does not cover all aspects of modern day life.
The uprising against Gadhafi erupted in February as part of anti-government revolts spreading across the Middle East. Neighboring Tunisia, which put the so-called Arab Spring in motion with mass protests nearly a year ago, has taken the biggest step on the path to democracy, voting for a new assembly Sunday in its first truly free elections. Egypt, which has struggled with continued unrest, is next with parliamentary elections slated for November.
Libya's struggle has been the bloodiest so far in the region. Mass protests quickly turned into a civil war that killed thousands and paralyzed the country for the past eight months. Gadhafi's hometown of Sirte was the last loyalist stronghold to fall last week, but Gadhafi's son and one-time heir apparent, Seif al-Islam, apparently escaped with some of his supporters.
Abdul-Jalil paid tribute to the Gulf Cooperation Council, a six-nation alliance led by Saudi Arabia, the Arab League and the European Union. NATO, which aided the anti-Gadhafi fighters with airstrikes, performed its task with "efficiency and professionalism," he added.
President Barack Obama congratulated Libyans on the declaration.
"After four decades of brutal dictatorship and eight months of deadly conflict, the Libyan people can now celebrate their freedom and the beginning of a new era of promise," he said.
But just hours before that statement, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and Britain's new defense secretary, Philip Hammond, said a full investigation into Gadhafi's death is necessary.
Hammond said the Libyan revolutionaries' image had been "a little bit stained" by Gadhafi's death, Hammond adding that the new government "will want to get to the bottom of it in a way that rebuilds and cleanses that reputation."
"It's certainly not the way we do things," Hammond told BBC television. "We would have liked to see Col. Gadhafi going on trial to answer for his misdeeds."
Clinton told NBC's "Meet the Press" that she backs a proposal that the United Nations investigate Gadhafi's death and that Libya's National Transitional Council look into the circumstances, too.
An autopsy confirmed that Gadhafi died from a gunshot to the head, Libya's chief pathologist, Dr. Othman al-Zintani, said. However, the pathologist said he would not disclose further details or elaborate on Gadhafi's final moments, saying he would first deliver a full report to the attorney general.
Libya's acting prime minister, Mahmoud Jibril, said he would not oppose an investigation, but cited an official reporting saying a wounded Gadhafi was killed in crossfire// one word in 2002 following his capture. Addressing the celebrations around Gadhafi's body, Jibril told the BBC in an interview on Sunday: "You have to appreciate the agony that people went through for 42 years."
The 69-year-old Gadhafi was captured wounded, but alive Thursday in his hometown of Sirte, the last city to fall to revolutionary forces. Bloody images of Gadhafi being taunted and beaten by his captors have raised questions about whether he was killed in crossfire as suggested by government officials or deliberately executed.
Gadhafi's body has been on public display in a commercial freezer in a shopping center in the port city of Misrata, which suffered from a bloody siege by regime forces that instilled a virulent hatred for the dictator in Misrata's residents.
People have lined up for days to view the body, which was laid out on a mattress on the freezer floor. The bodies of Gadhafi's son Muatassim and his ex-defense minister Abu Bakr Younis also were put on display, and people wearing surgical masks have filed past, snapping photos of the bodies.
The New York-based group Human Rights Watch, which viewed the bodies, said video footage, photos and other information it obtained "indicate that they might have been executed after being detained."
"Finding out how they died matters," said Sarah Leah Whitson of Human Rights Watch. "It will set the tone for whether the new Libya will be ruled by law or by summary violence."
The Syrian-based Al-Rai TV station, which has served as a mouthpiece for the Gadhafi clan, said the dictator's wife, Safiya, also demanded an investigation.
"I am proud of the bravery of my husband, Moammar Gadhafi, the holy warrior, and my sons who confronted the aggression of 40 countries over the past six months," the station quoted the widow as saying in a statement.
The vast majority of Libyans seemed unconcerned about the circumstances of the hated leader's death, but rather was relieved the country's ruler of 42 years was gone, clearing the way for a new beginning.
"If he (Gadhafi) was taken to court, this would create more chaos, and would encourage his supporters," said Salah Zlitni, 31, who owns a pizza parlor in downtown Tripoli. "Now it's over."
The long-awaited declaration of liberation starts the clock on Libya's transition to democracy. The transitional leadership has said it would declare a new interim government within a month of liberation and elections for a constitutional assembly within eight months, to be followed by votes for a parliament and president within a year.
At the ceremony in Benghazi, Abdul-Jalil outlined several changes to align with Islamic law.
"This revolution was looked after by God to achieve victory," he said.
Abdul-Jalil said new banks would be set up to follow the Islamic banking system, which bans charging interest as a practice deemed usury. For the time being, he said interest would be canceled from any personal loans already taken out and less than 10,000 Libyan dinars (about $7,500).
He also announced the annulment of an existing family law that limits the number of wives Libyan can take, contradicting the provision in the Muslim holy book, the Quran, that allows men up to four wives.
And he urged Libyans to hand back money or property taken during the civil war.
Abdul-Jalil thanked those who fought and fell in the fight against Gadhafi's forces.
"They are somewhere better than here, with God," he said.
___
Associated Press writers Jamal Halaby in Southern Shuneh, Jordan and Raphael G. Satter in London contributed to this report.


Read more on Newsmax.com: Libyan Leader Declares Nation Islamic, Sharia Law to be Implemented
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Tea Party activist confronts Obama about Biden's 'terrorist' remark


On Monday, President Obama got into an exchange with a tea party activist who wanted to know if the Vice President had called Tea Party Republicans terrorists.
The President did not directly answer Ryan Rhodes, but whined that he knows what it's like to be called names and was not about to be lectured on the topic.
“Now, in fairness, since I’ve been called a socialist who wasn’t born in this country, who is destroying America and taking away its freedoms because I passed a health care bill, I’m all for lowering the rhetoric," Obama said, according to Fox News.
The President did discuss the issue with Rhodes after the event.
Fox reports "the duo was spotted in an animated conversation a few moments later."
Rhodes later told Fox the President denied Biden called the Tea Party terrorists.
According to Fox:








Continue reading on Examiner.com Tea Party activist confronts Obama about Biden's 'terrorist' remark - Spokane Conservative | Examiner.com http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-spokane/tea-party-activist-confronts-obama-about-biden-s-terrorist-remark#ixzz1VCtTijmh