Showing posts with label White house Muslim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label White house Muslim. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

YOUR VOICE COUNTS!

The second half of the 112th Congress has just begun and I thought it would be a good time to update everyone on the status of legislation on ACT! for America’s “High Priority List.” These are legislative proposals that have been introduced in the 112th Congress that we feel are important to our national security interests and which we have publicly endorsed and are actively supporting via the national office and our grassroots base.

Please go to the Contact Congress page on our website to learn more about each of these bills and to send a pre-written e-mail of support to your Members of Congress. It couldn’t be easier and it’s so very important. Each of you plays an important role in seeing these critical proposals move through the legislative process successfully. As you’ll see, many are “stuck in committee.” These proposals will move further through the legislative process only if your federal legislators hear from you.


Legislation on ACT! for America’s High Priority List for the 112th Congress

  1. The “Birthright Citizenship Protection Act of 2011”
    House Sponsor: Rep. Steve King, R-IA; Senate Sponsor Sen. David Vitter, R-LA

    STATUS:
    House: H.R. 140 - Introduced: 1/5/2011 and referred to the House Judiciary Committee; 1/24/11 further referred to its Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement, where it is awaiting further action.
    Senate: S. 723 - Introduced: 4/5/2011, and referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee where it is awaiting further action.

  2. The “First Responders Fighting Terrorism Protection Act of 2011”
    House Sponsor: Rep. Sue Myrick (R-NC)

    STATUS:
    House: H.R. 504 - Introduced 1/26/2011, and referred to House Judiciary Committee; 2/14/2011 further referred to its Subcommittee on the Constitution where it is awaiting further action.

  3. The “See Something, Say Something Act of 2011”
    House Sponsor: Rep. Peter King (R-NY); Senate Sponsor: Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME)

    STATUS:
    House: H.R. 495 - Introduced 1/26/2011 and referred to the House Judiciary Committee; 2/28/2011 further referred to its Subcommittee on the Constitution. The legislation was included in the DHS Authorization bill that passed out of the House Homeland Security Committee in November, 2011. The legislation is expected to come before the full House of Representatives for debate and a vote by this spring.
    Senate: S. 505 - Introduced 3/8/2011 and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary where it is awaiting further action.

  4. The “Secure High-voltage Infrastructure for Electricity from Lethal Damage (SHIELD) Act”
    House Sponsor: Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ)

    STATUS:
    House: H.R. 668 - Introduced 2/11/2011 and referred to the House Energy and Commerce Committee and further to its Subcommittee on Energy and Power. The legislation was also referred to the House Budget Committee. It is awaiting further action by both Committees.

  5. The “Team B Act”
    House Sponsor: Rep. Frank Wolf (R-VA)

    STATUS:
    House: H.R. 1502 - Introduced 4/12/2011 and referred to House Intelligence Committee. A modified version of the Team B Act was included in the Fiscal Year 2012 Intelligence Authorization bill and signed into law on 1/3/2011. It authorizes a one-year competitive analysis exercise in the DNI’s office. Though it’s short of what Rep. Wolf wants, he feels that it’s a good first start, as it provides a competitive analysis on the issue of radicalization.

  6. The “Open Fuel Standard Act of 2011”
    House Sponsor: Rep. John Shimkus (R-IL); Senate Sponsor: Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-WA)

    STATUS:
    House: H.R. 1687 - Introduced 5/3/2011 and referred to House Energy and Commerce Committee and further to its Subcommittee on Energy and Power where it is awaiting further action.
    Senate: S. 1603 - Introduced 9/22/2011 and referred to Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation where it is awaiting further action.

  7. The “Secure Visas Act”
    House Sponsor: Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX)

    STATUS:
    House: H.R. 1741- Introduced 5/5/2011 and referred to the House Judiciary Committee; and the House Homeland Security Committee. On 5/6/2011the bill was referred to the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement, where hearings were held on 5/11/2011. On 5/19/2011 the bill was referred to the Homeland Security Committee’s Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security; On 6/23/2011 bill was discussed and modified by the Immigration Policy Subcommittee. They then voted (17-11) that it be sent to the full House of Representatives for further discussion and a vote. It is awaiting further action by the full House of Representatives.

  8. The “Secure Border Act of 2011”
    House Sponsor: Rep. Candice Miller (R-MI)

    STATUS:
    House: H.R. 1299 - Introduced 3/31/2011 and referred to the House Homeland Security Committee; On 4/6/2011 the bill was referred to its Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security; On 6/2/2011 the Subcommittee discussed and modified the legislation and then forwarded the bill back to the full Committee; On 9/21/2011the full Committee discussed and further modified the legislation. On 11/10/2011 they then voted to send the legislation to the House floor for debate and a vote. (Report # 112-274); The bill has been placed on the House Union Calendar (where bills wait for the Speaker to schedule discussion and a vote by the full House) and is expected to come before the full House sometime in 2012.

  9. The “National Guard Border Enforcement Act”
    House Sponsor: Rep. Ted Poe (R-TX)

    STATUS:
    House: H.R. 152 - Introduced 1/5/2011 and referred to the House Armed Services Committee; 2/4/2011 further referred to its Subcommittee on Emerging Threats and Capabilities where it is awaiting further action.

  10. The “Iran Threat Reduction Act”
    House Sponsor: Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL)

    STATUS:
    House: H.R. 1905 - Introduced 5/13/2011 and referred to the House Foreign Affairs Committee; 12/14/2011 - Passed in the U.S. House of Representatives by vote of 410-11(Roll Call #927) and sent to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee where it is awaiting further action. (Note: As this bill passed in the House late last year, there is no active letter writing campaign on our Contact Congress page at this time.)

  11. The “9/11 Commission Review Act”
    House Sponsor: Rep. Peter King (R-NY)

    STATUS:
    House: H.R. 2623 - Introduced 7/22/2011 and referred to the House Homeland Security Committee. The legislation was included in the DHS Authorization bill that passed out of the House Homeland Security Committee in November, 2011. The legislation is expected to come before the full House of Representatives for debate and a vote by this spring.

REMEMBER, YOUR VOICE COUNTS!
IF EACH OF US DOES JUST A LITTLE, TOGETHER WE CAN
ACCOMPLISH A LOT!

Sunday, February 5, 2012

The spice must flow

I will explain the title in this commentary further down.

The Jewish vote is starting to abandon Obama. Most are going to independent some Republican .
Antisemitism caused by Obama and his Muslim Brotherhood friends are spreading throughout the Democratic Party and Jewish leaders are trapped in the Democratic Party just to save face. Meanwhile you have traitor Debbie Schultz who will take Obama side because she is a Democratic "Yes man". A "Yes Man" for Obama thinking her job is secure as long as she Yes's this Black Muslim and you don't know where he ends and she begins.

By the way ignorant Obama believers think that saying something against Muslims is a racist remark. Being Muslim is not a race but a ideological government called Sharia in the religion which they will force on you when they out number you. Convert by the sword is not just a motto but a way of life. Now your argument is going to be "Well I know Muslims and they are not that way!" Do you really know them? Do you really understand when they talk in Arabic among themselves? Maybe you should learn the 4 phases of Islamic conquest and understand why they are so nice to you when they are few in your area and not nice when they are in a large group of Muslims and you become the minority.

The word Jihad that Obama was avoiding by saying it means many things is a lie or Takeyya!
  • Takeyya", means lying or misdirecting you or stealing the truth.
The word Jihad means HOLY WAR!

Obama the Muslim will lie, cheat, and misdirect to destroy America as a free sovereign country and bring it down to it's knees so his handlers the Saudis could come into this country take over the Oil and Coal mines as well as the silver, gold and mineral mines. They will not convert everyone to Islam because they can't use Muslims as slaves. They will use the infidel as slaves and work them to death like Nazi Germany was doing in WW2 to the Jews. 

"The spice must flow!" comes right out of the Dune saga by Frank Herbert and I believe sometimes fiction and science fiction can be a foreshadowing of what is to become.

STAGE 1: INFILTRATION
Muslims are moving to non-Muslim countries in increasing numbers and
the beginning of cultural conflicts are visible, but often subtle.
• First migration wave to non-Muslim “host” country.
• Appeal for humanitarian tolerance from the host society.
• Attempts to portray Islam as a peaceful & Muslims as victims of misunderstanding
and racism (even though Islam is not a ‘race’).
• High Muslim birth rate in host country increase Muslim population.
• Mosques used to spread Islam and dislike of host country & culture.
• Calls to criminalize “Islamophobia” as a hate crime.
• Threatened legal action for perceived discrimination.
• Offers of “interfaith dialogue” to indoctrinate non-Muslims.

STAGE 2: CONSOLIDATION OF POWER
Muslim immigrants and host country converts continue demands for accommodation
in employment, education, social services and courts.
• Proselytizing increases; Establishment and Recruitment of Jihadi cells.
• Efforts to convert alienated segments of the population to Islam.
• Revisionist efforts to Islamize history.
• Efforts to destroy historic evidence that reveal true Islamism.
• Increased anti-western propaganda and psychological warfare.
• Efforts to recruit allies who share similar goals (communists, anarchists).
• Attempts to indoctrinate children to Islamist viewpoint.
• Increased efforts to intimidate, silence and eliminate non-Muslims.
• Efforts to introduce blasphemy and hate laws in order to silence critics.
• Continued focus on enlarging Muslim population by increasing Muslim
births and immigration.
Use of charities to recruit supporters and fund jihad.
• Covert efforts to bring about the destruction of host society from within.
• Development of Muslim political base in non-Muslim host society.
• Islamic Financial networks fund political growth, acquisition of land.
• Highly visible assassination of critics aimed to intimidate opposition.
• Tolerance of non-Muslims diminishes.
• Greater demands to adopt strict Islamic conduct.
• Clandestine amassing of weapons and explosives in hidden locations.
• Overt disregard/rejection of non-Muslim society's legal system, culture.
• Efforts to undermine and destroy power base of non-Muslim religions
including and especially Jews and Christians.

STAGE 3: OPEN WAR on LEADERSHIP & CULTURE
Open violence to impose Sharia law and associated cultural restrictions;
rejection of host government, subjugation of other religions and customs.
• Intentional efforts to undermine the host government & culture.
• Acts of barbarity to intimidate citizens and foster fear and submission.
• Open and covert efforts to cause economic collapse of the society.
• All opposition is challenged and either eradicated or silenced.
• Mass execution of non-Muslims.
• Widespread ethnic cleansing by Islamic militias.
• Rejection and defiance of host society secular laws or culture.
• Murder of “moderate” Muslim intellectuals who don’t support Islamization.
• Destruction of churches, synagogues and other non-Muslim institutions.
• Women are restricted further in accordance with Sharia law.
• Large-scale destruction of population, assassinations, bombings.
• Toppling of government and usurpation of political power.
• Imposition of Sharia law

STAGE 4: Totalitarian ISLAMIC “THEOCRACY”
Islam becomes the only religious-political-judicial-cultural ideology.
• Sharia becomes the "law of the land.“
• All non-Islamic human rights cancelled.
• Enslavement and genocide of non-Muslim population.
• Freedom of speech and the press eradicated.
• All religions other than Islam are forbidden and destroyed.
• Destruction of all evidence of non-Muslim culture, populations
and symbols in country (Buddhas, houses of worship, art, etc)
.
The House of Islam (“peace”), dar al-Islam, includes those nations
that have submitted to Islamic rule, to Sharia law. The rest of the
world in in the House of War, dar al-harb, because it does not submit
to Sharia law, and exists in a state of rebellion or war with the
will of ‘Allah.’ No non-Muslim state or its citizens are “innocent,”
and remain viable targets of war for not believing in ‘Allah.’

The Christian, Jewish, Copts, Hindus and Zoroastrian peoples of
world have suffered under subjugation for centuries. Dhimmis are
forbidden to construct houses of worship or repair existing ones,
economically crippled by the jizya (tax), socially humiliated, legally
discriminated against, and generally kept in a permanent state of
weakness, fear and vulnerability by Islamic governments.




Jewish Voters Shifting Toward GOP
Jewish voters have been turning away from the Democratic Party and moving toward stronger support of Republicans over the last three years, a new poll from the Pew Research Center reveals.
In 2008, 72 percent of Jews identified themselves as Democrats or said they leaned toward the Democratic Party, giving Democrats a 52 percentage point advantage over Republicans.
But in 2011, support for Democrats had dropped to 65 percent, and GOP backing had risen from 20 percent to 29 percent, meaning Jewish voters prefer Democrats by a “significantly smaller 36-point margin,” Pew observed.
The Research Center stated: “Jewish voters, who have traditionally been and remain one of the strongest Democratic constituencies, have moved noticeably in the Republican direction.
“While the majority of Jews are still Democrats or lean toward the Democratic Party, Democrats' dominance among this group has weakened since the last presidential election. In fact, Jews are the only religious group analyzed in which the percentage who identify themselves as Republican (as opposed to leaning toward the GOP) has risen significantly.”
Commenting on the Pew survey, Republican Jewish Coalition Executive Director Matt Brooks said in a statement: "This notable analysis from the unimpeachable professionals at the Pew Research Center shows a significant shift in Jewish political identification — a shift toward Republicans and away from Democrats. This was not the softer move of more Jewish respondents saying that they 'lean' Republican, but a solid shift in Jewish self-identification as Republicans.
"We had the strong Jewish vote for Republican Bob Turner in the special election in New York’s 9th district last year. The American Jewish Committee poll in the fall of 2011 showed a significant erosion in Jewish support for President Obama. In that poll, for the first time, a plurality or majority of Jewish respondents disapproved of the president's handling of key issues such as the economy and the U.S.-Israel relationship.
"These facts reinforce the case we have been making that the Republicans are making political inroads in the Jewish community."

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

White House dodges Obama’s college transcripts


WND EXCLUSIVE

http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/carney-dodges-obamas-college-transcripts/

White House dodges Obama’s college transcripts

Evades question with comment about tax documents


The apparent stonewalling at the White House over vast areas of Barack Obama’s background continues.
In response to a question today at the daily news briefing that concerned Obama’s college records and transcripts, press spokesman Jay Carney said it was a good idea to have presidential candidates release their tax records.
Tax records?
Yes.
The question came from Ed Henry of Fox News.
“Now, I don’t know how many years – maybe you do – George Romney released of his college transcripts, but Republicans like to complain the president has not released his college transcripts. What is the stated reason for that?” he asked.
“I’d refer you to the campaign. I mean, I think,” Carney started.
“Is it a question you could take,” Henry said.
“Sure. I think we’ve answered this a bunch. I think that the tradition of releasing income tax records for presidential candidates, for serious potential nominees and nominees of the two parties is well established. It’s not a law, but it’s well established. And it’s one that this president abided by when he was a candidate as senator. It’s one that numerous Republicans and Democrats have abided by, and we just think it’s a good idea,” Carney said.
A video of the 50-plus minute briefing was posted on the government’s White House website.
Les Kinsolving, WND’s correspondent at the White House, previously has raised the issue of documentation for Obama several times, getting shut down each time, starting with Robert Gibbs when he was Obama’s press secretary.
The earlier questions dealt with Obama’s birth documentation because of the numerous questions that remain unanswered over his eligibility under the Constitution’s requirement that a president be a “natural born citizen.”That’s thought to mean the offspring of two citizen parents, and possibly even the offspring born in the country of two citizen parents. That’s why some of the documentation routinely released by presidents before Obama seems pertinent to reporters.
Among the other documents not released by Obama are his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.
He released a “Certification of Live Birth” during his 2008 campaign, stating it was the only document available to confirm his story of his birth in Hawaii. Then in 2011 he released an image of a Hawaii “Certificate of Live Birth” saying that confirmed his Hawaii birth.
But experts in computers, imaging, documents and text all have stated that the image released by the White House is no more or less than a fraud.
Seriously, where’s the REAL birth certificate? Find out the latest on Obama’s eligibility right now!
The first time Kinsolving posed a question about Obama’s eligibility, Gibbs’ response was to guffaw in unison with members of the Washington press corps about the concerns of hundreds of thousands of petitioners who demanded it.
“Are you looking for the president’s birth certificate?” he asked incredulously. “Lester, this question in many ways continues to astound me. The state of Hawaii provided a copy with the seal of the president’s birth. I know there are apparently at least 400,000 people – (laughter) – that continue to doubt the existence of and the certification by the state of Hawaii of the president’s birth there, but it’s on the Internet because we put it on the Internet for each of those 400,000 to download. I certainly hope by the fourth year of our administration that we’ll have dealt with this burgeoning birth controversy.”
Gibbs was referring to the “Certification of Live Birth,” touted at the time as the only document available. It was later supplanted by the “Certificate of Live Birth.”
Bill Press later raised the question for Gibbs about whether the “birthers” ever would fade.
“I almost hate to indulge in such an august setting as the White House – and I mean this in seriousness – the White House briefing room discussing the made-up, fictional nonsense of whether or not the president was born in this country,” Gibbs said at the time. “A year-and-a-half ago I asked that the birth certificate be put on the Internet because lord knows, you got a birth certificate and you put it on the Internet, what else could be the story?”
But again, he was referring to the “Certification of Live Birth” that later was replaced.
Even later, Gibbs stumbled over his explanation of where Obama was born.
“I can’t tell you why somebody believes, despite all preponderance of the evidence, that the president was born … uhm … in … uhh, uhh … was born here and not somewhere else. I’ve stopped trying to explain that,” he said.





In today’s briefing, Carney again declined to allow Kinsolving to ask any questions. Kinsolving had come prepared to ask about the furor created by a video purporting to show U.S. Marines urinating on the bodies of apparent Taliban members in Afghanistan.
The issue was explored recently by Col. Ollie North in a commentary.
He noted, “Our so-called mainstream media have launched a new anti-military feeding frenzy. The furor is over a crude 39-second video showing four Marines apparently urinating on the bodies of three dead Taliban combatants. In hysteric rhetoric akin to ‘news reports’ on the 2004 Abu Ghraib photos, hordes of print and broadcast ‘correspondents’ rushed to describe the viral video, which surfaced Jan. 11, as evidence of an ‘atrocity’ and ‘desecration’ that reflects the ‘depravity’ of our military in general and the U.S. Marines in particular. As usual, the effort to denigrate our armed forces means that the potentates of the press ignored far more important stories.”
He said that the proper procedure would be to investigate the truth, then make a determination on punishment should that be warranted.
“That’s what should happen. But that wasn’t enough for the masters of the media. Within hours of the video’s appearing on the Internet, ‘reporters’ launched a global race to interview any and all who were willing to express righteous outrage over ‘the actions of our servicemen’ and thereby disparage the reputations of the millions of soldiers, sailors, airmen, guardsmen and Marines who have served honorably and courageously in more than a decade of war,” he said.
Kinsolving had wanted to ask Carney whether the coverage levels were “overkill.”
Ask Obama your own question.

Friday, January 13, 2012

Not the last Supreme Court delivers a knockout punch to the White Hous


Supreme Court delivers a knockout punch to the White House

Published January 11, 2012
| FoxNews.com
Wednesday the United States Supreme Court delivered a knockout blow to the White House in the cause of religious liberty.
Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for a unanimous court swatted away the government’s claim that the Lutheran Church did not have the right to fire a “minister of religion” who, after six years of Lutheran religious training had been commissioned as a minister, upon election by her congregation.
The fired minister -- who also taught secular subjects -- claimed discrimination in employment. The Obama administration, always looking for opportunities to undermine the bedrock of First Amendment religious liberty, eagerly agreed.
Here, in this case, the Department of Justice had the nerve to not only challenge the exemption’s application but also its very existence.
But, Chief Justice Roberts pushed back hard, telling the government essentially to butt out:
“Requiring a church to accept or retain an unwanted minister, or punishing a church for failing to do so, intrudes upon more than a mere employment decision. Such action interferes with the internal governance of the church, depriving the church of control over the selection of those who will personify its beliefs. By imposing an unwanted minister, the state infringes the free exercise clause, which protects a religious group’s right to shape its own faith and mission through its appointments. According the state the power to determine which individuals will minister to the faithful also violates the establishment clause, which prohibits government involvement in such ecclesiastical decisions.”
Citing well-known legal precedent dating as far back as Reconstruction, the court made it clear that it is not up to the government to contradict a faith’s determination as to who should -- and should not -- be performing religious functions.
The Supreme Court clearly announced Wednesday that the First Amendment itself gives special recognition to the rights of religious organizations and rejected the government’s view that the Religion Clauses of the Constitution don’t apply to religious organizations’ freedom to select their own ministers, priests, rabbis and imams.
The Court also took aim at Plaintiff’s Cheryl Perich’s claims for back pay finding that such relief would operate as an unconstitutional penalty against a religious institution for terminating an unwanted minister and exercising its constitutional right to make decisions about internal church governance. Unfortunately, the federal government has become expert in imposing penalties for practicing one’s faith.
As the new year rolls on, Americans face even greater issues in their desire to retain their religious freedom. The mandates of ObamaCare -- with its narrowly tailored if not measly conscience exemptions protecting some religious orders from compliance -- will mandate thousands of other religious organizations ranging from educational institutions to insurance companies to insure and/or provide procedures like free sterilization and abortifacients like Plan B known to be violative of many Christians and Jewish faiths.
Will the government continue to test the bounds of religious liberty?
Will the government continue to pick fights against religious freedom?
Will the government continue to demand that Americans violate their faith tenets or worse from an intolerant government? Only time will tell.
But for today, the founding fathers are smiling down at a Supreme Court that could not agree more about how wrong-headed our government is in trying to hijack our constitutional right to religious liberty.
Peter Johnson, Jr. is a Fox News Legal Analyst and attorney.He has also successfully litigated issues with regard to the rights of religious organizations.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/01/11/supreme-court-delivers-knockout-punch-to-white-house/#ixzz1jJMU3tvp

Saturday, December 24, 2011

The Way Forward is not Backwards


When did America become an Islamic Country? Why would America supply Muslim headscarves and Turbans as part of the Uniform? Who allowed this to be even considered? If you are that religious don't join the Service. You obey the laws of America. You don't see Jews demanding yamakas/kippahs, why should we supply any religion with a religious garb?
Leah would not stand for this. Vote for Leah Lax get her nominated. She is asking you for help. Please donate money we need $25,000 for the Primary race. Give America the biggest Present ever and vote Obama out in the Primary. Now Leah is registered in all 50 states as a write in candidate.  
She will investigate Obama. She will see to it that all his files are opened to the public including his birth certificate by Executive Order and go from there. 
She will secure America's borders and stop all aid to countries who scream death to America!
She will stand by Israel. 
She will not allow Sharia into this country. 
She will not allow Religious Laws regardless of what religion to influence American Government. 
She will expose government Fraud and reopen the New Black Panther Case. 
She will investigate Eric Holder and his influence on the Judges.
She will open American Oil and Gas drilling along with Coal mining, and she will protect the environment as well as seek new energies. 
She will reopen NASA.
She will reopen the Naval Yards and put America back to work. 
She will decrease business taxes so businesses could hire more people with reduction in  tax scale on hired Americas only . 
She will vacation only at Camp David which belongs to WE the People and it will not cost the American tax payer one extra dime. 
She will keep her doors open for suggestions. 
She will show the American people the pictures of Bin Laden, if he died from Obama's "raid", and she will investigate how the Navy Seals died. 
She will not sign any bill in that have pork bellies and ear marks.
She will revoke Obama Care and devise a new Medical plan for those who can not afford medical insurance, cap all insurance including Car, Home, Dental, Vision, Podiatry and Medical.
She will not allow Veterans of any war to be without Free Veterans Medical and Mental Health insurance and care. VA hospitals and clinics will be expanded.
She will not allow Muslims to get free Medical Care just because their religion does not allow Insurance. Since Islam does not allow Medical insurance Leah will pass a Executive Order that Muslim Doctors cannot take Medicare or Medicaid. 
She will not allow Sharia Mortgages in America. 
She will make government smaller but she will protect Social Security and other needed social programs for seniors, children and the disable. 
She will start to begin to investigate welfare fraud.
She will make the Department of Education smaller and give the States back the control of education.
She will investigate all Anti-American, Anti-Constitution Groups such as Muslim Jihad Cells, Neo-Nazi and KKK cells, disarm them and disband them
She will be everyone's President excepting those who want to overthrow the Constitution.
As far as the UN, America will be part of the UN but will not participate in any war against any friendly country of the USA.
America will not be part of the EU or the Global Union. America has been the New Order since 1776. Our forefathers designed it that way. The New Order was designed so that every country in the world would follow freedom. Please people do your research on the founding fathers wanted a New Order of Government to protect all religious practices.  

Don't listen to  hysterical rumors

Visit www.leahlax.com and donate now


HOMELAND INSECURITY

U.S. Army uniforms to include Muslim headscarves, turbans?

Islamic groups tied to international jihad continue to infiltrate American military


Posted: December 23, 2011
3:37 pm Eastern
By Aaron Klein
© 2011 WND






JROTC cadets on the USS Theodore Roosevelt

After intervention by the Council on American Islamic Relations, the Defense Department reportedly decided it will now allow Muslim students participating in the Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps to wear headscarves and turbans while in uniform.
The decision marks the latest influence by controversial Islamic groups on military affairs.
WND previously broke the story that an Islamic group that has been closely tied to the Muslim Brotherhood and was named by the Justice Department as an unindicted co-conspirator in a scheme to raise money for Hamas is the official endorsing agency for the U.S. Armed Forces Muslim chaplain program.
The Islamic Society of North America, or ISNA, also runs regular events for the military's Muslim chaplains.
WND also reported the Army's Muslim chaplain program was founded by a terror-supporting convict while the Army's first Islamic chaplain, who is still serving, has been associated with a charity widely accused of serving as an al-Qaida front.
On Thursday, CAIR announced its activism was responsible for the decision to allow Muslim garb in the JROTC.
The Islamic group got involved following an incident in October in which a Muslim teen, Demin Zawity, reportedly quit the JROTC when her commanding officer at a Brentwood, Tenn., high school would not allow her to wear her hijab in the homecoming parade.
CAIR sent a letter to Defense Secretary Leon Panetta requesting "constitutionally-protected religious accommodations for the girl and for future Muslim JROTC participants."
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army Larry Stubblefield responded to CAIR's complaint by explaining the JROTC program will not allow religious headwear.
"Based on your concerns, the Army has reviewed its JROTC uniform policy and will develop appropriate procedures to provide Cadets the opportunity to request the wear of religious head dress, such as the turban and hijab," Stubblefield wrote in the letter, made public by CAIR. "This change will allow Miss Zawity and other students the chance to fully participate in the JROTC program."
While CAIR's activism may have taken place outside the Army, there are terror-tied Islamic groups that act in full partnership with the U.S. military.
Terror co-conspirator vets military chaplains
Since the Muslim chaplain program's inception in 1993, ISNA has been the official endorsing agency of the military's new chaplains.
In 2005, ISNA initiated a yearly Muslim chaplain conference that includes leadership talks for chaplains in both the military and U.S. prison system.
Discover the Networks notes that ISNA –through its Saudi-government-backed affiliate the North American Islamic Trust – reportedly holds the mortgages on 50 percent to 80 percent of all mosques in the U.S. and Canada.
ISNA was founded in 1981 by the Saudi-funded Muslim Students' Association, which was founded partially by the Muslim Brotherhood. The two groups are still partners.
WND attended an MSA event at which violence against the U.S. was urged by speakers.
"We are not Americans," shouted one speaker, Muhammad Faheed, at Queensborough Community College in 2003. "We are Muslims. [The U.S.] is going to deport and attack us! It is us versus them! Truth against falsehood! The colonizers and masters against the oppressed, and we will burn down the master's house!"
ISNA was named in a May 1991 Muslim Brotherhood document – "An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America" – as one of the Brotherhood's likeminded "organizations of our friends" who shared the common goal of destroying America and turning it into a Muslim nation.
Islam scholar Stephen Schwartz describes ISNA as "one of the chief conduits through which the radical Saudi form of Islam passes into the United States."
According to terrorism expert Steven Emerson, ISNA "is a radical group hiding under a false veneer of moderation" that publishes a bimonthly magazine, Islamic Horizons, that "often champions militant Islamist doctrine."
The group also "convenes annual conferences where Islamist militants have been given a platform to incite violence and promote hatred," states Emerson. Emerson cites an ISNA conference in which al-Qaida supporter and PLO official Yusuf Al Qaradhawi was invited to speak.
Emerson further reports that in September 2002, a full year after 9/11, speakers at ISNA's annual conference still refused to acknowledge Osama bin Laden's role in the terrorist attacks.
Also, ISNA has held fundraisers for terrorists, notes Discover the Networks. After Hamas leader Mousa Marzook was arrested and eventually deported in 1997, ISNA raised money for his defense. The group also has condemned the U.S. government's post-9/11 seizure of the financial assets of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
Muslim convict founded chaplain program
ISNA has not been the only official endorsing agency of the military's Muslim chaplain program.
A former endorsing agency along with ISNA was the American Muslim Armed Forces and Veterans Affairs Council, created in 1991 and operating under the umbrella of the American Muslim Foundation.
The American Muslim Foundation was founded by Abdul Rahman al-Amoudi, an Islamic cleric who served as an Islamic adviser to President Bill Clinton and who guided the establishment of the military's Muslim chaplain program.
Al-Amoudi reportedly handpicked the Army's first Islamic chaplain, Imam Abdul-Rasheed Muhammad, who still serves in that position.
Al-Amoudi was instrumental in selected several other of the military's six Islamic chaplains.
Al-Amoudi currently is serving a 23-year sentence for illegal terrorism-related financial transactions with the Libyan government and for his role in a Libyan conspiracy to assassinate then-Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah.
Al-Amoudi was described as an "expert in the art of deception" in a report by Newsweek journalists Mark Hosenball and Michael Isikoff.
The Newsweek article noted Al-Amoudi espoused moderate, pro-American views while lobbying for Muslim causes in the U.S. but then expressed support for Hamas and Hezbollah at an Islamist rally.
Al-Amoudi founded in 1990 the American Muslim Council, a lobbying group to advocate on behalf of Muslims in the United States.
Army's first chaplain tied to 'al-Qaida front'
Muhammad was recommended for appointment by Al-Amoudi's American Islamic Council.
Al-Amoudi attended Muhammad's swearing-in ceremony just as he was present for the 1996 swearing-in of the military's second Muslim chaplain, Lt. JG Monje Malak Abd al-Muta Ali Noel Jr.
Each Muslim chaplain must first be endorsed by an official Islamic agency.
Like most of the military's Muslim chaplains, Muhammad's endorsing agency was the ISNA.
Muhammad is a convert to Islam. In 1974 he joined the Lost-Found Nation of Islam, a Black Muslim group that espoused racial separatism and black nationalism. Muhammad later said he did not fully subscribe to the radical group's philosophy, but was attracted by what he said was the organization's emphasis on personal responsibility and self-help.
"In the projects where I grew up," Muhammad said, "the women were exploited. In the Nation of Islam, the men were always polite. They were always clean cut. I felt the Nation of Islam had more to offer than the church."
In a 1993 interview with Muslehuddin Ahmed of Islam4all.com, Muhammad detailed his association with the Muslim World League, or MWL, a Saudi-funded Muslim charity accused of terrorism financing and ties to al-Qaida.
The website reports Muhammad was in dialogue with the charity to help establish the Army's Muslim chaplain program.
During the period of Muhammad's association with the MWL, the group spawned Muslim charities that were alleged fronts for al-Qaida and Osama bin Laden.
Muhammad recounted to Islam4all how he was an "honored guest" of the MWL for his Hajj pilgrimage to Mecca.
"He was also full of praise for the Muslim World League for its excellent arrangements, which it had made for its guests, and was highly impressed by its dedicated Secretary General Dr. Ahmad Muhammad Ali, who symbolized for him a model Muslim leader," reported Islam4all.
The Islamic website reported Muhammad offered to work closely with the MWL and that he began an "ongoing interaction with the MWL in shaping and developing a vital Islamic presence within the U.S. Armed Forces."
The website reported Muhammad "evinced keen interest in the magazines and other publications of the Muslim World League and other similar organizations for support in his Dawah work."
Al-Qaida links
The MWL, meanwhile, was founded in Mecca in 1962 and bills itself as one of the largest Islamic non-governmental organizations.
But according to U.S. government documents and testimony from the charity's own officials, it is heavily financed by the Saudi government.
The MWL has been accused of terror ties, as have its various offshoots, including the International Islamic Relief Organization, or IIRO, and Al Haramain, which was declared by the U.S. and U.N. a terror financing front.
The Treasury Department, in a September 2004 press release, alleged Al Haramain had "direct links" with Osama bin Laden. The group is now banned worldwide by United Nations Security Council Committee 1267.
There long have been reports citing accusations the IIRO and MWL also repeatedly funded al-Qaida.
In 1993, bin Laden reportedly told an associate that the MWL was one of his three most important charity fronts.
An ADL profile of the MWL accuses the group of promulgating a "fundamentalist interpretation of Islam around the world through a large network of charities and affiliated organizations."
"Its ideological backbone is based on an extremist interpretation of Islam and several of its affiliated groups and individuals have been linked to terror-related activity," the profile says.
In 2003, U.S. News and World Report documented that accompanying MWL's donations, invariably, are "a blizzard of Wahhabist literature."
"Critics argue that Wahhabism's more extreme preachings – mistrust of infidels, branding of rival sects as apostates, and emphasis on violent jihad – laid the groundwork for terrorist groups around the world," the report continued.
An Egyptian-American cab driver, Ihab Mohamed Ali Nawawi, was arrested in Florida in 1990 on accusations he was an al-Qaida sleeper agent and a former personal pilot to bin Laden. At the same time he was accused of serving bin Laden, he also reportedly worked for the Pakistani branch of the MWL.
The MWL in 1988 founded the Al Haramain Islamic Foundation, developing chapters in about 50 countries, including for a time in Oregon until it was designated a terror organization.
In the early 1990s, evidence began to grow that it was funding Islamist militants in Somalia and Bosnia, and a 1996 CIA report detailed its Bosnian militant ties.
The U.S. Treasury designated Al Haramain's offices in Kenya and Tanzania as sponsors of terrorism for their role in planning and funding the 1998 bombings of two American embassies in East Africa. The Comoros Islands office was also designated because it "was used as a staging area and exfiltration route for the perpetrators of the 1998 bombings."
The New York Times reported in 2003 that Al Haramain had provided funds to the Indonesian terrorist group Jemaah Islamiyah, which was responsible for the 2002 Bali bombings that killed 202 people. The Indonesia office was later designated a terrorist entity by the Treasury.
In February 2004, the U.S. Treasury Department froze all of Al Haramain's financial assets pending an investigation, leading the Saudi government to disband the charity and fold it into another group, the Saudi National Commission for Relief and Charity Work Abroad.
In September 2004, the U.S. designated Al-Haramain a terrorist organization.
In June 2008, the Treasury Department applied the terrorist designation to the entire Al-Haramain organization worldwide
Bin Laden's brother-in-law
In August 2006, the Treasury Department also designated the Philippines and Indonesia branch offices of the MWL-founded IIRO as terrorist entities "for facilitating fundraising for al Qaida and affiliated terrorist groups."
The Treasury Department added: "Abd Al Hamid Sulaiman Al-Mujil, a high-ranking IIRO official [Executive director of its Eastern Province Branch] in Saudi Arabia, has used his position to bankroll the al-Qaida network in Southeast Asia. Al-Mujil has a long record of supporting Islamic militant groups, and he has maintained a cell of regular financial donors in the Middle East who support extremist causes."
In the 1980s, Mohammed Jamal Khalifa, Osama bin Laden's brother-in-law, ran the Philippines offices of the IRRO. Khalifa has been linked to Manila-based plots to target the pope and U.S. airlines.
The IRRO has also been accused of funding Hamas, Algerian radicals, Afghanistan militant bases and the Egyptian terror group Al-Gama'a al-Islamiyya.
The New York Post reported the families of the 9/11 victims filed a lawsuit against IIRO and other Muslim organizations for having "played key roles in laundering of funds to the terrorists in the 1998 African embassy bombings" and for having been involved in the "financing and 'aiding and abetting' of terrorists in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing."
'Saudi government front'
In a court case in Canada, Arafat El-Asahi, the Canadian director of both the IIRO and the MWL, admitted the charities are near-entities of the Saudi government.
Stated El-Asahi: "The Muslim World League, which is the mother of IIRO, is a fully government-funded organization. In other words, I work for the government of Saudi Arabia. I am an employee of that government.
"Second, the IIRO is the relief branch of that organization, which means that we are controlled in all our activities and plans by the government of Saudi Arabia. Keep that in mind, please," he said.
Despite its offshoots being implicated in terror financing, the U.S. government never designated the MWL itself as a terror-financing charity. Many have speculated the U.S. has been trying to not embarrass the Saudi government.
The CAIR legal attack on WND's author is far from over. WND needs your help in supporting the defense of "Muslim Mafia" co-author P. David Gaubatz, as well as his investigator son Chris, against CAIR's lawsuit. The book's revelations have led to formal congressional demands for three different federal investigations of CAIR. In the meantime, however, someone has to defend these two courageous investigators who have, at great personal risk, revealed so much about this dangerous group. Although WND has procured the best First Amendment attorneys in the country for their defense, we can't do it without your help. Please donate to WND's Legal Defense Fund now


Read more: U.S. Army uniforms to include Muslim headscarves, turbans? http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=380593#ixzz1hTCumbGJ
 

Thursday, December 8, 2011

Arpaio gets death threats over Obama investigation


OBAMA HAS TO BE SCARED I HAVE 4 STATES NOW AND BEING HARASSED ALSO. I TOO HAVE DEATH THREATS. ONLY MY FINGER IS ITCHING TO GIVE OBAMA THE BIRD WHEN I WIN THE ELECTION.  
SHERIFF JOE ARPAIO I ADMIRE YOU!
 KEEP ON DIGGING YOU WILL FIND THE GOLD AND THE KEY TO LOCK THAT LYING SACK OF MUSLIM CRAP OF A PRESIDENT AWAY.
REMEMBER SIGN MY PETITION ON WWW.LEAHLAX.COM AND DONATE. WE NEED TO THROW THIS FRAUD OUT OF OFFICE IN THE PRIMARY AND WHEN I AM ELECTED I WILL INVESTIGATE HIM AND EVERYONE WHO PROTECTED HIM INCLUDING THE MEDIA WHO REFUSES TO TELL THE TRUTH IN THE NEWS ABOUT OBAMA



CERTIFIGATE

Arpaio gets death threats over Obama investigation

Warned he 'will be filled with thousand bullet holes'


Posted: December 08, 2011
12:35 am Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2011 WND




Sheriff Joe Arpaio
Maverick Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio says his "Cold Case Posse" investigating Barack Obama's presidential eligibility will release a preliminary report in February of its findings, which he expects to be "controversial."
"This is a serious law enforcement investigation, and our findings are going to be controversial but based in facts," the Maricopa County sheriff told WND. Arpaio said a comprehensive report will be issued shortly after the February preliminary report.
"The investigators on the Cold Case Posse are doing a great job," Arpaio told WND. "They are all law enforcement professionals, and they are all volunteers putting in a lot of hours at no taxpayer expense."
Arpaio confirmed that the Obama investigation has broadened beyond an examination of whether or not the birth certificate made public by the White House on April 27 is an authentic document. The probe, he said, is examining Obama's history in regard to his eligibility to be president under Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.
"We are not taking the Obama investigation lightly," Arpaio said. "The Cold Case Posse is actively tracking down all leads received, because the people deserve to know the truth."
Jerome Corsi's New York Times best-seller, "Where's the Birth Certificate?" is available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore
Arpaio's investigative team has amassed hundreds of pages of documentation and taken testimony from dozens of experts in preparation for a final phase of field investigation
On Tuesday, Arpaio posted on his Facebook page a reference to a Globe Magazine report citing inside sources in the White House who say President Obama and the First Lady are in "a panic" over the Maricopa County investigation.
The reaction to Arpaio's posting indicates public interest in the probe is high, despite relatively little coverage by establishment media.
Since Tuesday, Arpaio's Facebook posting has received more than 7,900 "like this" clicks from readers, 780 shares and over 1,700 comments.
Arpaio also continues to receive messages of a different sort, with numerous death threats arriving at his office for his decision to investigate Obama's eligibility.
"I plan to kill Joe Arpaio first," read one particularly ominous death threat. "He will be filled with a thousand bullet holes before the year is out. I promise you this – Arpaio won't **** with Obama."
Maricopa County Deputy Chief David Trombi told WND that all death threats are being thoroughly investigated, with the intent to hold the culprits legally responsible for their actions.
"We can't take the risk of ignoring a threat, regardless how wild or crazy the threat may appear," Trombi said.
Arpaio, who has built a national reputation as a tough enforcer of Arizona's immigration laws, is no stranger to death threats.
"The threats regarding the Obama investigation may set a new standard for partisanship, but they are nothing new," Trombi said. "Four separate Mexican drug cartels have placed bounties totaling $4 million on his head. That's about as serious as you can get, and the sheriff has had to live with this for years."
Arpaio, nevertheless, is determined to bring the Obama investigation to a successful conclusion.
"The American people deserve to know the truth about Obama," Arpaio said. "We are a major law enforcement agency – one of the largest in the nation – and we have at our disposal investigative tools not generally available, even to the top private investigator in the country. We don't plan to stop until we discover the truth."
Those wishing to contribute to the 501(c)3 supporting the Cold Case Posse investigation may send tax-deductible donations to the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office at: MCSO Cold Case Posse, P.O. Box 74374, Phoenix, Ariz., 85087.


Read more: Arpaio gets death threats over Obama investigation http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=375329#ixzz1fz13XG2U

Monday, December 5, 2011

Yes we can It's all about you Cool Obama enough of this crap



This movie should be call Obama the Dictator. He said Yes we can Yep he can destroy America. Today's campaign slogan It's all about you .The real translation is It's all about Obama. 
The movie is a campaign of advertisement nothing else. Obama did say he'll be a REAL President if re-elected and show you he can do much better. Better is looting the USA of money for his lavish vacation Better then keeping employment down by implementing more restrictions on Jobs and preventing new business to open that are non union. I rather see a Monkey in office . At least we can get a good laugh at the show. But Obama has instilled a bill that states if you talk about the  government you are a terrorist and can be haul off to a Military Jail and murdered for your right to express yourself which is called the 1st amendment. Obama meant with Yes we can take away you 1st amendment right "Freedom of Speech, Freedom to petition the Government and Freedom of the Press.
Vote for the 1st Amendment by voting for Leah Lax , visit Leah Lax at www.leahlax.com sign the petition to put Leah on the Ballot and please donate what you can. 


No Joke….Hollywood Making “Obama Is Cool” Movie, Will Be Released Just Prior To Election


http://floppingaces.net/2011/08/07/no-joke-hollywood-making-obama-is-cool-movie-will-be-released-just-prior-to-election/




Obama, the “yes we can” President, has become a joke. He was always been a joke with conservatives but now the independents have been let in on the joke while the left is upset at how ineffectual he has been in pushing their Socialist dreams.
So how can Obama and his friends change this?
Why, by making a movie about the only thing he did right and releasing it a few weeks before the election….that’s how:
The White House clearly blessed the dramatic reconstruction of the mission by Nicholas Schmidle in The New Yorker — so vividly descriptive of the Seals’ looks, quotes and thoughts that Schmidle had to clarify after the piece was published that he had not actually talked to any of them.
“I’ll just say that the 23 Seals on the mission that evening were not the only ones who were listening to their radio communications,” Schmidle said, answering readers’ questions in a live chat, after taking flak for leaving some with the impression that he had interviewed the heroes when he wrote in his account that it was based on “some of their recollections.”
The White House is also counting on the Kathryn Bigelow and Mark Boal big-screen version of the killing of Bin Laden to counter Obama’s growing reputation as ineffectual. The Sony film by the Oscar-winning pair who made “The Hurt Locker” will no doubt reflect the president’s cool, gutsy decision against shaky odds. Just as Obamaland was hoping, the movie is scheduled to open on Oct. 12, 2012 — perfectly timed to give a home-stretch boost to a campaign that has grown tougher.
The moviemakers are getting top-level access to the most classified mission in history from an administration that has tried to throw more people in jail for leaking classified information than the Bush administration.
It was clear that the White House had outsourced the job of manning up the president’s image to Hollywood when Boal got welcomed to the upper echelons of the White House and the Pentagon and showed up recently — to the surprise of some military officers — at a C.I.A. ceremony celebrating the hero Seals.
Shameless…..just shameless.
I would love to have a good movie about the mission and the heroes that took part it in but when it’s obviously being done to boost this man’s image, I cannot abide. I mean giving hollywood producers and writers access to highly classified intel?
Are you freaking kidding me?
One has to wonder how they will portray that 16 hours of “pondering” Obama did to even green light the operation.
I’m sure somehow that will be excised from this two hour infomercial for Obama “The Great”.