In October 2011, a Halloween parade was held by
an atheist group in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania. Along the route was a fanatic
Muslim immigrant who felt the need to attack violently an atheist wearing a
"zombie Mohammed" costume. The Muslim hothead assaulted the innocent man and was
arrested.
Now a district court judge in Pennsylvania has
ruled against the victim and claimed victim status for the violent thug, while
reminding us that in a Muslim-dominant country, this assaulted nonbeliever could
be executed for his "blasphemy." The judge not only upheld Islamic or sharia
law, but he also admitted that Islam is a violent religion which kills people.
Will the terrorist-linked cult
CAIR now go after the
judge for his blatant "
Islamophobia" in associating Islam with violence? Or perhaps
anti-American
CAIR will castigate the Muslim man for demonstrating once again to the
American populace that Islam makes people violent? The violent Muslim man is
obviously also an Islamophobe!
Teeny-tiny, powerless
minority?
As we can see, this "
no sharia in
America" lie has been put to rest, as it has also been previously. In the
meantime, this judge Mark W. Martin should be removed from office and disbarred.
It is contended Martin himself is a Muslim, but the testimony to that supposed
fact is unclear. If Martin
is a Muslim, then his presence and ruling
provide evidence that the "teeny-tiny minority" of Muslims in this country is
anything but powerless.
Rumor has it that during the first Gulf War
(1990-1991) thousands of U.S. military personnel converted to Islam. These
individuals would now be in their 40s and 50s, and in positions of power. Is
this judge, Mark W. Martin - who is also purportedly a U.S. veteran - one of
them? What are his qualifications and how was he appointed? How many other
"reverts" are now in judicial positions in America, ready to rule according to
Islamic/sharia law, as this judge has done? How many of these "Manchurian
Candidates" are in still in the military, dictating policy? How many in the
political realm, FBI, CIA, etc.? And our schools, colleges and universities?
Service companies like the post office, internet and phone providers, with
records of home addresses?
Is the attorney for the defendant also a Muslim
"revert?"
R. Mark Thomas represented Elbayomy and applauds the
judge.
"I think this was a good dressing down by the judge," he said.
"The so-called victim was the antagonist and we introduced evidence that clearly
showed his attitude toward Muslims. The judge didn't do anything I wouldn't have
done if I was in that position."
Here's an article about this Pennsylvania sharia
law brouhaha by my friend Al Stefanelli:
by Al Stefanelli
The Pennsylvania State
Director of American Atheists, Inc., Mr. Ernest Perce V., was assaulted by a
Muslim while participating in a Halloween parade. Along with a Zombie Pope,
Ernest was costumed as Zombie Muhammad. The assault was caught on video, the
Muslim man admitted to his crime and charges were filed in what should have been
an open-and-shut case. That’s not what happened, though.
The defendant is an immigrant
and claims he did not know his actions were illegal, or that it was legal in
this country to represent Muhammad in any form. To add insult to injury, he
also testified that his 9 year old son was present, and the man said he felt he
needed to show his young son that he was willing to fight for his Prophet.
The case went to trial, and
as circumstances would dictate, Judge Mark Martin is also a Muslim. What
transpired next was surreal. The Judge not only ruled in favor of the defendant,
but called Mr. Perce a name and told him that if he were in a Muslim country,
he’d be put to death. Judge Martin’s comments included:
“Having had the benefit
of having spent over 2 and a half years in predominantly Muslim countries I
think I know a little bit about the faith of Islam. In fact I have a copy of the
Koran here and I challenge you sir to show me where it says in the Koran that
Mohammad arose and walked among the dead. I think you misinterpreted things.
Before you start mocking someone else’s religion you may want to find out a
little bit more about it it makes you look like a
dufus and Mr. (Defendant) is correct. In many Arabic
speaking countries something like this is definitely against the law there. In
their society in fact it can be punishable by death and it frequently is in
their society.
Judge Martin then offered a
lesson in Islam, stating:
“Islam is not just a
religion, it’s their culture, their culture. It’s their very essence their very
being. They pray five times a day towards Mecca to be a good Muslim, before you
die you have to make a pilgrimage to Mecca unless you are otherwise told you can
not because you are too ill too elderly, whatever but you must make the attempt.
Their greetings wa-laikum as-Salâm
(is answered by voice) may god be with you. Whenever, it’s very common
when speaking to each other it’s very common for them to say uh this will happen
it’s it they are so immersed in it.
Judge Martin further
complicates the issue by not only abrogating the First Amendment, but completely
misunderstanding it when he said:
“Then what you have done
is you have completely trashed their essence, their being. They find it very
very very offensive. I’m a Muslim, I find it offensive. But you have that right,
but you’re way outside your boundaries or first amendment rights. This is what,
and I said I spent about 7 and a half years living in other countries. when we
go to other countries it’s not uncommon for people to refer to us as ugly
Americans this is why we are referred to as ugly Americans, because we are so
concerned about our own rights we don’t care about other people’s rights as long
as we get our say but we don’t care about the other people’s say”...
Needless to say, this is
totally, completely and unequivocally unacceptable. That a Muslim immigrant can
assault a United States citizen in defense of his religious beliefs and walk
away a free man, while the victim is chastised and insulted by a Muslim judge
who then blamed the victim for the crime committed against him is a horrible
abrogation.
This reeks of those cases we used to read about
where a woman is blamed for her own rape because she “was asking for
it” by virtue of the clothing she chose to wear, and then having the Judge
set the rapist free.
I can promise you this, you have not heard the
last of this issue. Not by a long shot.
