Professor Denis Sullivan, who was exposed by our video
(www.shameonneu.com) has now been removed from the official faculty list of the
Jewish Studies Department at Northeastern University. He retains his position as
head of Northeastern's Middle East Center. This makes four staffers at
Northeastern who have been dismissed or have had their positions shifted in the
wake of our video exposes.
Below is my analysis of why
Jewish professors are reluctant to speak out in defense of Jewish students who
tell them about anti-Israel professors at their schools.
Asymmetrical
Cognitive Warfare at Northeastern University
Their Professors and
"Ours"
by Charles Jacobs
Richard Cravatts' new book,
"Genocidal Liberalism: The University's Jihad Against Israel and the Jews,"
concludes that across America, "it is the academics who lead the charge against
Israel." This seems confirmed by our experience at Northeastern University
(NEU), where anti-Israel (and anti-Semitic) professors have taught hundreds if
not thousands of America's future leaders a negative and at times demonic view
of the Jewish state and its supporters.
Apart from the damage this
does to American support for Israel, it can also create a hostile climate on
campus for Jews. Indeed, the Jewish students who appear on our NEU videos
(www.shameonneu.com) complain that they feel culturally and ethnically assaulted
in some classes.
But why are so many American
college professors hostile to Israel? Cravatts explains that anti-Israelism fits
perfectly into the worldview of many liberal professors as a twisted extension
of the left's standard critique of the West. A simplified version goes like
this: Western power, racism and xenophobia stand in the way of world peace,
justice and equality. Israel is a projection of Western power, a European colony
in the heart of indigenous, brown, impoverished innocents. Israel is bad because
the West is bad, but also Israel's "oppression of the Palestinians" makes
Westerners accessories to a crime which leftists insist is the most significant
crime on the planet. Western holocaust guilt created this problem; decent
Westerners must fight to right this wrong. The attacks on Israel and Jews
attract non-leftists as well; Leftists now join with a growing influx of Muslims
on U.S campuses for a powerful coalition.
On many campuses across the
country, "Palestinianism" - the view that the greatest human rights sin on the
planet is Jewish "oppression" of the Arabs - has become the reigning doctrine.
Indeed, events such as the mass murder of civilians in Syria and horrific
assaults on Christian communities in Sudan, Egypt and Iraq, or the subjugation
of women, gays and minorities in the Muslim world, which don't fit the paradigm
are mostly ignored.
Universities have become
saturated with this thinking. Sadly, the Jewish response has been mostly silent
acquiescence or denial.
Beginning in 2001, some
Jewish activists, seeing that mainstream Jewish organizations were failing to
act, launched grassroots organizations to address the campus problem. For the
most part - but with some important exceptions - their strategies focused
exclusively on educating Jewish students on campus about the Israeli-Arab
conflict and preparing Jewish high schoolers for the campus battles that lay
ahead. The unspoken assumption was that Jewish students could counter the
leftist, often tenured faculty. If it wasn't clear then, it's obvious now that
this was a false assumption.
While it is absolutely
necessary to educate Jewish students - indeed, several of the grassroots groups
do a fine and important job of it - given the forces arrayed against Israel on
campus, it is simply insufficient. Without significant support of their
communities, Jewish students - no matter how well-versed in historical truths -
cannot possibly take on anti-Israel professors and the weak administrations that
cower before them. In the face of an implacable combination of factors lined up
against pro-Israel students on campus, viz., the professors, the weak
administrators, leftist and "human rights" groups, Islamic groups and Islamic
funding of universities - the Jewish community has left Jewish students
virtually alone on the battlefield. There are exceptions that can be detailed in
a later column.
But, one should ask, what
about "our" professors - the Jews who teach on campus? Don't they help Jewish
students confront the forces arrayed against them? Not so much - and it is a sad
tale.
When we produced "Columbia
Unbecoming" in 2004 about the intimidation of Jewish students at Columbia
University, many Jewish professors validated the complaints we heard from Jewish
students. Yet not one of them would publicly speak out in their defense. (We
were tempted to rename the film "The Marranos of Morningside Heights.")
Since then I've spoken to
dozens of Jewish professors, many of whom agree on the factors that explain
their silence:
* Protect "academic freedom"
at all costs. This is a red line which, if breeched, invites no end of possible
interference from outside the Ivory Tower walls. Professors love their autonomy
(and, I assume, their lack of accountability to the outside world). But Academic
Freedom was granted to scholars so they could pursue the truth in a scientific,
rigorous manner. Now with the triumph of relativism it has become a wild card,
giving license to preach partisan biases as scholarship, undeterred. It is hard
in today's academy to defend the idea of truth, or the existence of objective
methods to distinguish lies and errors from true representations of reality.
* Anti-provincialism. "I
didn't study so hard to become "the AIPAC professor of the Middle East." As
liberals, Jewish professors have much criticism of Israel. Fair enough. But many
have adopted a strictly universalist posture where defending one's own small
tribe is seen as selfish and provincial. Better to be seen as caring for
"everyone." For many of these academics to be Jewish is to be for the
"other."
* Personal Peace Uber Alles:
Professors are people who chose the contemplative life and do not wish to be
embroiled in sour or hostile relations in their places of work.
* Job
security and maximizing career opportunities. No disrespect intended, but
perhaps this should be at the top of the list.
I understand that Jewish
professors at NEU recently met to discuss our videos. We can only hope that some
will decide to tell the public what they know, and stand up for honesty and
academic rigor.
Powerful forces press people
to remain loyal to their institutions - and their employers. Powerful forces
have pushed Jews to express how non-tribal they are. These things might even
prompt a Jewish teacher from Northeastern to write in to the Advocate defending
and praising Professor Denis Sullivan, whose lectures, syllabi, curricula, and
invited guests are shown on our video to be clearly designed to poison the minds
of students against the Jewish state. Professor Sullivan typically invites a
token Jewish professor to lecture in his class so he can say he's shown both
sides. Perhaps this Jewish professor didn't know that. Perhaps now he will
develop a regard for his dignity. Such a shift is not without precedent.
The Hillel rabbi at Columbia,
Charles Sheer, was the one Jewish campus leader with courage. He agreed to be
interviewed on our film to defend the truths that the Jewish students expressed.
He admitted he was sorry for his long silence. Here's what he said:
"I remember what would happen
when a student would come to me, and report these incidences, and what could I
really say to them other than 'well, first of all, you have to go back to the
professor; maybe you misheard them; talk it through.' Then, if that's not the
case they actually said that, the next thing I would say to them is 'you have to
talk to the chair of your department.' And if that gave you no recourse you'd
have to go and talk to the dean. Honestly I know what happened after I gave them
my carefully, softly, gently-couched advice. None of the students would ever do
that. You know it takes an awful lot of ego strength for a 17-, 18-, 19-,
20-year-old student to go back to a professor and to challenge him. I was very
disappointed and disappointed in myself not to be able to get more people to
speak out against these issues."
Rabbi Sheer tried to redeem
himself by ending his silence. I truly hope that some (right now I'd take even
one) of NEU's Jewish professors will say in public what they know and say among
themselves: that their Jewish students are right to complain and should be
helped. |
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.