Please note this Jaafer was one of the stars on All American Muslim and in the Video Obama uses the name HUSSEIN in Dearborn showing he is one of them A MUSLIM. Now why did he hide it when he was running and telling everyone he's a "Committed Christain"? Why because it's called taqiyya and kitman.
Muslim scholars teach that Muslims should generally be truthful to each other, unless the purpose of lying is to "smooth over differences."
There are two forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, taqiyya and kitman. These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause Islam - in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.
The Qur'an:
Qur'an (16:106) - Establishes that there are circumstances that can "compel" a Muslim to tell a lie.
Qur'an (3:28) - This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to "guard themselves."
Qur'an (9:3) - "...Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters..." The dissolution of oaths with the pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture. They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway.
Qur'an (40:28) - A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must "hide his faith" among those who are not believers.
Qur'an (2:225) - "Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts" The context of this remark is marriage, which explains why Sharia allows spouses to lie to each other for the greater good.
Qur'an (66:2) - "Allah has already ordained for you, (O men), the dissolution of your oaths"
Qur'an (3:54) - "And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers." The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara, which literally means deceit. If Allah is deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21)
Taken collectively these verses are interpreted to mean that there are circumstances when a Muslim may be "compelled" to deceive others for a greater purpose.
From the Hadith:
Bukhari
(52:269) - "The Prophet said, 'War is deceit.'" The context of this
is thought to be the murder of Usayr ibn Zarim and his thirty unarmed men by
Muhammad's men after he "guaranteed" them safe passage (see Additional Notes
below).
Bukhari
(49:857) - "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good
information or saying good things, is not a liar." Lying is permitted when
the end justifies the means.
Bukhari
(84:64-65) - Speaking from a position of power at the time, Ali confirms
that lying is permissible in order to deceive an "enemy."
Muslim
(32:6303) - "...he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything
what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing
reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to
his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted
form in order to bring reconciliation between them)."
Bukhari
(50:369) - Recounts the murder of a poet, Ka'b bin al-Ashraf, at Muhammad's
insistence. The men who volunteered for the assassination used dishonesty to
gain Ka'b's trust, pretending that they had turned against Muhammad. This drew
the victim out of his fortress, whereupon he was brutally slaughtered despite
putting up a ferocious struggle for his life.
From Islamic Law:
Reliance of the Traveler (p. 746 -
8.2) - "Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy
aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to
accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible
to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible
to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N:i.e. when the purpose of lying is
to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible),
and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory... it is religiously
precautionary in all cases to employ words that give a misleading
impression...
"One should compare the bad consequences entailed by lying to
those entailed by telling the truth, and if the consequences of telling the
truth are more damaging, one is entitled to lie.
Additional Notes:
Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers in order to defeat
them. The two forms are:
Taqiyya - Saying something that isn't true.
Kitman - Lying by omission. An example would
be when Muslim apologists quote only a fragment of verse 5:32
(that if anyone kills "it shall be as if he had killed all mankind")
while neglecting to mention that the rest of the verse (and the next) mandate
murder in undefined cases of "corruption" and "mischief."
Though not called Taqiyya by name, Muhammad clearly
used deception when he signed a 10-year treaty with the Meccans that allowed him
access to their city while he secretly prepared his own forces for a takeover.
The unsuspecting residents were conquered in easy fashion after he broke the
treaty two years later, and some of the people in the city who had trusted him
at his word were executed.
Another example of lying is when Muhammad used deception to
trick his personal enemies into letting down their guard and exposing themselves
to slaughter by pretending to seek peace. This happened in the case of Ka'b bin
al-Ashraf (as previously noted) and again later against Usayr ibn Zarim, a
surviving leader of the Banu Nadir tribe, which had been evicted from their home
in Medina by the Muslims.
At the time, Usayr ibn Zarim was attempting to gather an
armed force against the Muslims from among a tribe allied with the Quraish
(against which Muhammad had already declared war). Muhammad's "emissaries" went
to ibn Zarim and persuaded him to leave his safe haven on the pretext of meeting
with the prophet of Islam in Medina to discuss peace. Once vulnerable, the
leader and his thirty companions were massacred by the Muslims with ease,
belying the probability that they were mostly unarmed, having been given a
guarantee of safe passage (Ibn Ishaq 981).
Such was the reputation of Muslims for lying and then killing
that even those who "accepted Islam" did not feel entirely safe. The fate of
the Jadhima is tragic evidence for this. When Muslim "missionaries" approached
their tribe one of the members insisted that they would be slaughtered even
though they had already "converted" to Islam to avoid just such a demise.
However, the others were convinced that they could trust the Muslim leader's
promise that they would not be harmed if they simply offered no resistance.
(After convincing the skeptic to lay down his arms, the unarmed men of the tribe
were quickly tied up and beheaded - Ibn Ishaq 834 & 837).
Today's Muslims often try to justify Muhammad's murder of
poets and others who criticized him at Medina by saying that they broke a treaty
by their actions. Yet, these same apologists place little value on treaties
broken by Muslims. From Muhammad to Saddam Hussein, promises made to non-Muslim
are distinctly non-binding in the Muslim mindset.
Leaders in the Arab world routinely say one thing to
English-speaking audiences and then something entirely different to their own
people in Arabic. Yassir Arafat was famous for telling Western newspapers about
his desire for peace with Israel, then turning right around and whipping
Palestinians into a hateful and violent frenzy against Jews.
The 9/11 hijackers practiced deception by going into bars and
drinking alcohol, thus throwing off potential suspicion that they were
fundamentalists plotting jihad. This effort worked so well, in fact, that even
weeks after 9/11, John Walsh, the host of a popular American television show,
said that their bar trips were evidence of 'hypocrisy.'
The transmission from Flight 93 records the hijackers telling
their doomed passengers that there is "a bomb on board" but that everyone will
"be safe" as long as "their demands are met." Obviously none of these things
were true, but these men, who were so intensely devoted to Islam that they were
willing to "slay and be slain for the cause of Allah" (as the Qur'an puts it)
saw nothing wrong with employing Taqiyya in order to facilitate their
mission of mass murder.
The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) insists that it
"has not now or ever been involved with the Muslim Brotherhood, or supported
any covert, illegal, or terrorist activity or organization." In fact, it
was created by the Muslim Brotherhood and has bankrolled Hamas. At least nine
founders or board members of ISNA have been accused by prosecutors of supporting
terrorism.
Prior to engineering several deadly terror plots, such as the
Fort Hood massacre and the attempt to blow up a Detroit-bound airliner, American
cleric Anwar al-Awlaki was regularly sought out by NPR, PBS and even government
leaders to expound on the peaceful nature of Islam.
The near absence of Qur'anic verse and reliable Hadith that
encourage truthfulness is somewhat surprising, given that many Muslims are
convinced that their religion teaches honesty. In fact, it is because of this
ingrained belief that many Muslims are quite honest. When lying is addressed in
the Qur'an, it is nearly always in reference to the "lies against Allah" -
referring to the Jews and Christians who rejected Muhammad's claim to being a
prophet.
Finally, the circumstances by which Muhammad allowed a
believer to lie to a non-spouse are limited to those that either advance the
cause of Islam or enable a Muslim to avoid harm to his well-being (and
presumably that of other Muslims as well). Although this should be kept very
much in mind when dealing with matters of global security, such as Iran's
nuclear intentions, it is not grounds for assuming that the Muslim
one might personally encounter on the street or in the workplace is any less
honest than anyone else.
Please watch this Video and pass on. We need to spread the word. Terrorists live in Dearborn and need to be removed and sent to jail regardless of their age.
If any normal America can watch this video and NOT be infuriated with the brazen attack by Muslims in the middle of the day, while police stand by and watch, then you no longer deserve to be considered a normal American.
Dearborn, MI Police Allow Muslim’s to Stone Christians at 2012 Arab Festival
By Alan Kornman
Wayne County Deputy Chief Mike Jaafar summed up his situational awareness of the 2012 Dearborn Arab Festival in the Dearborn Patch by stating, “No official arrests were made, and Jaafar said his team was pleased with the overall outcome.”Unfortunately for Deputy Chief Jaafar, this video exposes what really happened on 6:10 PM at the Dearborn Arab Festival. This reporter can assure you, Deputy Chief Jaafar, there will be an entire country outraged by the overall outcome of your willful and possibly criminal conduct exposed in Mr. Ruben Israel’s video.
Wayne County Sheriff Department (WCSD) Deputy Chief Jaafar, in the video, appears to be part of the top leadership controlling ground operations at the festival along with Ms. Ursula K. Henry, Director of Legal Affairs for the WCSD. Deputy Chief Jaafar is shown in the video consulting Ms. Henry on what to do with Mr. Ruben Israel. That is until Chief Jaafar lost his professionalism, got in Mr. Israel’s face and unloaded an emotional rhetorical barrage for the whole world to see.
It would take a psychiatrist to tell explain why Deputy Chief Jaafar snapped, but this is what led up to Jaafar’s emotional outburst. Chief Richardson said to Mr. Israel, “…your going to leave now”, Mr. Israel responded, “…we’re not going to do that.”
Deputy Chief Jaafar immediately got into the camera frame and said, “It’s not your call, we’ve been very gentle and very very respectful to you and you are jeopardizing public safety. And you need to understand it’s gone overboard. We don’t have the coverage to protect you and if we have two officers who can protect you it would work great but it’s impossible to do so. Your attracting a crowd and your affecting public safety, you need to understand that.” Chief Jaafar then told Chief Richardson to take over from here and left the scene rudely without listening to Mr. Israel’s response.
Deputy Chief Jaafar articulated the solution to the problem by saying that if he had two officers assigned to Mr. Israel’s group everything “would work great”. This reporter believes Chief Jaafar because he has special training in Executive Protection according to his bio. It is beyond belief that Chief Jaafar could not or would not, pull two officers out of all those officers standing around to protect Mr. Israel’s right of free speech without fear of bodily harm. This reporter believes there was criminal negligence on the part of Deputy Chief Jaafar and the WCSD because Mr. Israel and his friends were the victims of Assault and Battery, injuries were sustained, and Chief Jaafar did not intervene to protect the victims of a possible 3rd Degree Felony happening under his and Ms. Henry’s supervision. The WCSD has a duty to serve and protect.
Let’s see how the law defines Battery:
A battery is the willful or intentional touching of a person against that person’s will by another person, or by an object or substance put in motion by that other person. Such an offensive touching can constitute a battery even though it does not cause physical injury, and could not reasonably be expected to cause injury. A defendant who emphatically pokes the plaintiff in the chest with his index finger to emphasize a point may be culpable for battery (although the damages award that results may well be small or nominal). Similarly, a defendant who spits on a plaintiff has committed a battery, even where the only injury is to the plaintiff’s dignity.
The video clearly shows multiple counts of assault, battery, and aggravated battery were inflicted upon Mr. Israel and his friends by the crowd shouting Allahu Akbar.Let’s see how the law defines Assault:
While references to “assault and battery” make it seem like the two acts are inseparable, within the context of personal injury law they are usually considered separate acts. An “assault” is an act which creates fear of an imminent battery. A “battery” is an unlawful, offensive touching.
Both assault and battery are intentional torts, meaning that the defendant actually intends cause harm to the plaintiff, be that the fear inspired by the assault or the offensive contact resulting from the battery. For a battery, there is no requirement that the victim suffer a physical injury. A battery may be indirect, caused by contact through a thrown stone, or spitting, and need not cause any harm beyond the contact itself in order to be actionable.
Based on the wounds inflicted on Mr. Israel’s forehead a case could be made for Aggravated Battery which is a Class 3 Felony. Otherwise according to Section 750.81 of the Michigan Penal Code simple battery is a misdemeanor punishable by no more than 93 days in jail or a $500 fine or both.The result of the Wayne County Sheriff’s office failure to protect Mr. Israel and his friends safety exposes a deep and systemic problem inside the WCSD. The WCSD leaving Mr. Israel unprotected knowing violence would happen is criminal.
The bottom line is Mr. Ruben Israel and his friends were viciously attacked by an angry mob and the WCSD watched it happen. It is not the issue if you like or dislike Mr. Israel’s speech. Our Constitution protects free speech and our taxpayer funded law enforcement agencies are sworn to uphold the right of free speech for everyone equally. Mr. Israel caught everything on film from the minute they arrived until the minute they left and very soon I imagine the WCSD, Arab American Chamber of Commerce, and the Mayor of Dearborn will have to answer for their actions.
The basics of Executive Protection skills Deputy Chief Jaafar possess and with the number of uniforms on the ground, Mr. Ruben Israel’s group of street preachers at the 2012 Dearborn Arab International Festival should have been protected by law enforcement when they were under attack. This reporter will go further to say Deputy Chief Jaafar was negligent in his duties and allowed scores of Class 3 Felonies to occur under his direction and oversight.In the video, Mr. Israel told Deputy Chief of Operations Dennis Richardson his attorney had sent a letter of their intentions to the WCSD and received no reply. Deputy Chief Richardson acknowledged Mr. Israel’s letter and that Mr. Israel and his group would be at the festival just as they were the previous year.
The Arab American Chamber of Commerce is one of the main sponsors of the event and is responsible for the cost of providing adequate security, comfort stations, and all the other details in putting on a citywide fair costing hundreds of thousands of dollars. In past events the City of Dearborn partnered with the Arab American Chamber in managing the Arab Festival.
The City of Dearborn / Arab Chamber of Commerce partnership resulted in the City of Dearborn loosing a 2010 freedom of speech lawsuit filed by George Saieg a Christian street preacher. This bigoted, hateful, and intolerance towards Christians shown by Dearborn Mayor John O’Reilly cost his city $100,000. The following year David Wood and his team were falsely arrested for breach of the peace. The Thomas More Law Center took David Wood’s case and won.
Dearborn, MI is a small town of around 100,000 people. People are asking, why is all this animosity and hate towards Christians manifesting itself in Dearborn. The answer may be in the fact Dearborn is 46% Muslim. Dearborn has the largest Muslim population of any city in America. It is up to the reader come to their own conclusions.
The multiple violent attacks on Mr. Ruben Israel and his friends was the most violent to date at the Arab Festival. The fact the violence by the predominately Muslim crowd against Christians was allowed to continue freely under the watchful eye of the Wayne County Sheriff’s Department is criminal. The WCSD, through their inaction in protecting Mr. Israel’s freedom of speech has sent a disturbing crystal clear message to the citizens of Dearborn that rioting and battery will be condoned by those entrusted to enforce the law. The message is that Dearborn Law enforcement will turn the other way when violence is inflicted on non-Muslims and that freedom of speech will be silenced in the no-go zone of Dearborn, MI.
On April 18, 2012 President Obama came to Dearborn and warmly introduced his friends Mayor John B. O’Reilly and Wayne County Sheriff Chief Benny Napoleon as providing the “change you can believe in.” Rarely seen in public the President referred to himself as President Barack “Hussein” Obama while emphasizing his middle name. Both the Mayor and Chief Napoleon the last two years have been knee deep in expensive and divisive free speech lawsuits pitting Muslims against Christians. Was the President sending a signal the escalating friction between Muslim and Non-Muslim in Dearborn is the change we can all believe in?
In the 1940 and 1950’s it was not uncommon to hear stories of small white controlled rural towns, about the size of Dearborn, allowing crimes against blacks and Jews to go unpunished and in some cases covered up. The Civil Rights movement righted those societal wrongs and those type of bigoted stories are a thing of the past.
Fast forward to 2012 In the City of Dearborn, MI, replace the blacks with Christians and the same bigotry and hatred of the 1950’s was on display at the 2012 Dearborn Arab American Festival by Deputy Chief Mike Jaafar who was “pleased with the overall outcome.
Deputy Chief Mike Jaafar admitted on video tape that if he had two officers available to shadow Mr. Israel and his friends “everything would be OK” and he chose not to do it shows willful misconduct.
The State of Michigan needs to conduct a serious outside investigation into this violent attack and remove those individuals found responsible.
Imam Al-Qazwini needs to use his position as leader of the Dearborn Muslim community and get actively involved with the festival demanding peace and tolerance from his followers. Imam Al-Qazwini must teach peace and tolerance towards Christian street preachers no matter how provocative they may be.
Article VI of the U.S. Constitution states United States law shall be the supreme law of the land not Shariah compliant blasphemy laws. All eyes will be on the City of Dearborn between now and next years Dearborn Arab American International Festival. And this reporter would not be surprised if a lawsuit or two are in the City of Dearborn’s Future.
God Bless American and God Bless our Troops
Alan Kornman
The United West
Regional Cooridinator
Email: alan@TheUnitedWest.org
≈≈≈
(NB: The United West did not tape this video nor do we know the Christians who were attacked. We found the raw video on the internet, produced this version and want to send it out to America)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.