Michelle Bachmann wants to think about the Threat of Islamic Based Terrorism and throw it in a committee if President

Michelle Bachmann wants to think about the Threat of Islamic Based Terrorism and throw it in a committee if President OH NO She broke a nail.... Hurry it's an emergency to get it filed and filled in.

Michelle Bachmann On The Threat Of Islamic Based Terrorism

July 3, 2011 11:59 am

The group known as “Team B II” includes experienced defense, intelligence and law enforcement practitioners – notably, former Director of Central Intelligence R. James Woolsey; Lieutentant Generals Harry E. Soyster and William G. Boykin, the former Defense Intelligence Agency Director and former Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence, respectively; former Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Fleet Admiral James A. Lyons; and former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy.

A report by General Counsel, Center for Security Policy, David Yerushalmi, and Professor Mordechai Kedar, published findings of a random survey of 100 representative mosques in the United States. “Of the 100 mosques surveyed, 51% had texts on site rated as severely advocating violence; 30% had texts rated as moderately advocating violence; and 19% had no violent texts at all.” Amazingly, “in 84.5% of the mosques, the imam recommended studying violence-positive texts. Fifty-eight percent of the mosques invited guest imams known to promote violent jihad.”

Presidential Candidate Michelle Bachmann wrote the following to this elite team:

“The Team B2 authors are to be commended for the release of their systematic research which will add to the discussion on sharia law’s impact on the United States!…It is our responsibility to understand the issues as we work on international levels with countries that practice sharia law and as we study the influence of sharia law on jihadists looking to harm our own State. Considering the alternatives, we know we are blessed in our nation to live under Constitutional Republic. We benefit from countless civil rights that are not found in all countries. I will continue to stand by these freedoms through the document I have sworn to uphold: The Constitution!”

The Team B2 authors revealed their well researched report entitled “Shariah: The Threat to America” and call on our government to do something hussein obama’s administration refuses to do. They have also uncovered an immediate threat on “the extent to which the Muslim Brotherhood’s stealthy “civilization jihad” has gained access to and influence over the United States government”, which is obviously a grave threat to our national security!

As reported on http://shariahthethreat.org :

For nearly a decade since 9/11, America’s national security establishment’s understanding of the threat of Islamic terrorism and its approach to contending with that danger flow directly from a conviction that they have nothing to do with Islam, except to the extent al Qaeda “perverts” or “hijacks” that religion. But what if this characterization of the problem we continue to face is simply and utterly wrong? What if there actually is a direct tie between what recognized, mainstream authorities of Islam call “shariah” and the jihad (or holy war) it demands of adherents, some of which is manifested as terrifying violence? What if, in addition, jihadists engage in non-violent – and, in some ways, far more insidious – efforts to accomplish the same goal: the supremacy of shariah worldwide under a caliph?
These questions have been the focus of an intensive six-month study by a remarkable group of highly accomplished civilian and military national security professionals. The results are in Shariah: The Threat to America.

On the Patriot Statesman, we uncovered that Thomas Jefferson got his wake up call on islam when he heard with his own ears, the muslim ambassador Abd Al-Rahman reveal that islam does not need a reason to attack American citizens, because “it was written in the Qur’an, that all Nations who should not have acknowledged the authority of mohammad were sinners, that it was the right and duty of every muslim to make war upon nonmuslims they could find and to make Slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Muslim who should be slain in battle was believed to go to Paradise.”
This 4th of July, let us unite against the greatest threat to our nation: ISLAM!

Note on the election: Michelle Bachmann’s letter is encouraging. Her pro-Israel stance is strong but Ed Rollins as her campaign manager raises unnecessary questions? Rollins ran pro Israel Governor Huckabee’s campaign but it is troublesome that he appeared at promuslim events with Ron Paul and Zogby in Dearborn, MI. His “defense” is that he is pro Israel and married to an Orthodox Jew, but for some reason, he does not provide a reasonable explanation for his appearance at the anti-Israeli event? Herman Cain is an awesome contender although sadly he tried to tone down the threat of sharia law in some of his interviews, but he would obviously by a marked improvement over obama. Romney is untrustworthy with his flip flopping. Lt. Col. Allen West has been the most consistent in this area, but unfortunately he is not running for President! Maybe if he is chosen as Vice President for Bachmann or Cain, the campaign would be solid in the need to address the islam problem. Nothing could help flip flop romney or obama!

Shari’a and Violence in American Mosques

Mordechai Kedar and David Yerushalmi

Middle East Quarterly
Summer 2011

---

ABSTRACT

random survey of 100 representative mosques in the U.S. was conducted to measure the correlation between Sharia adherence and dogma calling for violence against non-believers. Of the 100 mosques surveyed, 51% had texts on site rated as severely advocating violence; 30% had texts rated as moderately advocating violence; and 19% had no violent texts at all. Mosques that presented as Sharia adherent were more likely to feature violence-positive texts on site than were their non-Sharia-adherent counterparts. In 84.5% of the mosques, the imam recommended studying violence-positive texts. The leadership at Sharia-adherent mosques was more likely to recommend that a worshipper study violence-positive texts than leadership at non-Sharia-adherent mosques. Fifty-eight percent of the mosques invited guest imams known to promote violent jihad. The leadership of mosques that featured violence-positive literature was more likely to invite guest imams who were known to promote violent jihad than was the leadership of mosques that did not feature violence-positive literature on mosque premises.

PREFACE

he debate over the connection between Islam and its legal doctrine and system known as Sharia on the one hand and terrorism committed in the name of Islam on the other rages on among counter terrorism professionals, academics, policy experts, theologians, and politicians. Much of this debate centers on the evidence that the perpetrators of violence in the name of Islam source the moral, theological, and legal motivations and justifications for their actions in Sharia. Much of the opposition to this focus on Sharia centers on the argument that Sharia is and has been historically malleable and exploited for good and bad causes.
This study seeks to enter this fray but at a more empirical level. Since we know that mosques are in fact a situs of recruitment and “radicalization” for terrorism committed in the name of Islam, this study seeks to enter into that domain to determine if there is an empirical correlation between actual, manifest Sharia-related behaviors and the presence of violent and jihad-based literature, and further, the promotion of that literature. While the presence of violent and jihad-based literature alone does not necessarily suggest the worshippers at such a mosque adopt the violent literature’s approach to the use of violence, if the imams at such mosques also promote the literature, and if those mosques are more likely to invite guest imams and speakers who are known to promote violent jihad, the presence of these factors together would be strongly suggestive of an environment prone to jihad recruitment. Thus, this study also seeks to determine if the spiritual leadership in these mosques is supportive of this genre of literature.

---

Read ‘Shari’a and Violence in American Mosques’

by Mordechai Kedar and David Yerushalmi

Middle East Quarterly, Summer 2011

---

AUTHORS

Professor Mordechai KMichelle Bachmann wants to think about the Threat of Islamic Based Terrorism and throw it in a committee if Presidentedar

• Assistant Professor, Bar Ilan University, Israel, Departments of Arabic and Middle East Studies (since 1994)
• Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies, Bar-Ilan University, Israel.
• Herzliya Inter-Disciplinary Center, Israel – Study team: “Facing Radical Islam.”
• Jerusalem Institute for Israel Studies, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel – Study team: “Muslim Minorities in Western Countries.”

David Yerushalmi

• General Counsel, Center for Security Policy, Washington, D.C.
• Of Counsel, Dir. of Policy Studies, Institute for Advanced Strategic & Political Studies, Potomac, MD
• B.S. Public Policy Studies/Criminal Justice
• Juris Doctorate