Oh Dear Obama You have been voted DOWN YEAH!!!!!!!!!

Washington Times Opinion: Worst Week for Obama EVER

4/1/12
Four reasons Charles Hurt of the Washington Times gives for this being Obama's worst week ever!
Elevated Trayvon Marting shooting to a race fight. By addressing the murder and telling Americans to do some "soul searching", this case has been on the news everywhere.
Caught on an open mic speaking to Russian president. Speaking about how he'd sell out our missile defense secrets.
Supreme Court embarassed Obama's health care law. One judge equated the health insurance mandate to the Government mandating we purchase broccoli.
Obama's budget struck down 414-0. Not one house member voted for Obama's budget.

HURT: Brutal week for Obama, the worst of his presidency

By Charles Hurt

Thursday, March 29, 2012

The past seven brutal days will go down as one of the worst weeks in history for a sitting president. It certainly has been, without any doubt, the worst week yet for President Obama.
Somehow, Mr. Obama managed to embarrass himself abroad, humiliate himself here at home, see his credentials for being elected so severely undermined that it raises startling questions about whether he should have been elected in the first place — let alone be re-elected later this year.
Consider:
• Last Friday, Mr. Obama wandered into the killing of Trayvon Martin. Aided by his ignorance of the situation, knee-jerk prejudices and tendency toward racial profiling, Mr. Obama played a heavy hand in elevating a tragic situation in which a teenager was killed into a full-blown hot race fight.
Americans, he admonished, need to do some “soul-searching.” And then, utterly inexplicably, he veered off into this bizarre tangent about how he and the poor dead kid look so much alike they could be father and son. It was election-year race-pandering gone horribly wrong.
• By the start of this week, Mr. Obama had fled town and was racing to the other side of the planet just as the Supreme Court was taking up the potentially-embarrassing matter of Obamacare. While in South Korea he was caught on a hidden mic negotiating with the president of our longest-standing rival on how to sell America and her allies down the river once he gets past the next election.
• Meanwhile, back at home, the Supreme Court took up the single most important achievement of Mr. Obama’s presidency and, boy, was it embarrassing. The great constitutional law professor, it turns out, may not quite be the wizard he told us he was.
By most accounts, Mr. Obama and his stuttering lawyers were all but laughed out of the courthouse. They were even stumbling over softball questions lobbed by Mr. Obama’s own hand-picked justices.
• Mr. Obama closed his week pulling off a nearly unimaginable feat: He managed to totally and completely unify the nastily-fighting Democrats and Republicans in Congress. Late Wednesday night, they unanimously voted — 414 to zip — to reject the budget Mr. Obama had presented, leaving him not even a thin lily’s blade to hide behind.
So, in one week, Mr. Obama got caught whispering promises to our enemy, incited a race war, raised serious questions about his understanding of the Constitution, and then got smacked down over his proposed budget that was so wildly reckless that even Democrats in Congress could not support it.
It was as if you lumped Hurricane Katrina and the Abu Ghraib abuses into one week for George W. Bush. And added on top of that the time he oddly groped German Chancellor Angela Merkel and got caught cursing on a hot mic.
Even then, it wouldn’t be as bad as Mr. Obama’s week. You would probably also have to toss in the time Mr. Bush’s father threw up into the lap of Japan’s prime minister. Only then might we be approaching how bad a week it was for Mr. Obama.
Not that you will see any trace of embarrassment in the face of Mr. Obama. He has mastered the high political art of shamelessness, wearing it smugly and cockily. Kind of like a hoodie.
• Charles Hurt can be reached at charleshurt@live.com.

Obama Caught Red Handed on an Open Mic

Obama tells Russian leader that he will have more flexibility after he is reelected to pretty much do as he pleases. Is this the man you want negotiating international contracts and treaties on your behalf?
It is more educational to give you some context.
In mid-January, Dick Morris did a Youtube video titled "Obama Gives Defense Secrets to our Enemies!". According to Morris, Obama wanted better diplomatic relations with Russia and is prepared to give them our missile defense secrets. Morris is worried that Russia could hand this technology over to the Iranians. It would undermine our national security.
In fact, in February 2011, TheBlaze reported the US had agreed to give Russia UK's nuclear secrets.
Another story that is odd was a report by Wikileaks that said Obama had taken money from Russia. But the details of this was sparse and could have been based on heresay or weak sources anyways. Still, it is something to keep in mind.

Reporting on Obama's Plans to Share Defense Secrets

1/18/12
I was very disturbed by Dick Morris' video post today -- He titled it "Obama Gives Defense Secrets to our Enemies!".
The whole thought of this happening seems entirely ludicrous and deplorable. I respect Dick Morris but wondered if he was misinformed in some way?
So I did some research and it was hard to really find much on the subject when you do a Google News search.
The first news result came from a website that I never heard of and is hardly very authoritative. This is what the Greeley Gazette reported on the issue.
The Washington times reported several weeks ago that U.S. officials were planning to provide Moscow with the data from the SM-3. The SM-3 is part of America’s missile defense program that was begun under President Ronald Reagan.
Finally some specifics.
So when I did a search for Washington Times and missle secrets, I found this article on Fox News written by Bill Gertz of the Washington Times, January 5, 2012.

In the president’s signing statement issued Saturday in passing into law the fiscal 2012 defense authorization bill, Mr. Obama said restrictions aimed at protecting top-secret technical data on U.S. Standard Missile-3 velocity burnout parameters might impinge on his constitutional foreign policy authority.
As first disclosed in this space several weeks ago, U.S. officials are planning to provide Moscow with the SM-3 data, despite reservations from security officials who say that doing so could compromise the effectiveness of the system by allowing Russian weapons technicians to counter the missile.

The article title is called "RED SCARE: Obama Plans to Share Nuke Secrets with Russia" and has over 100K facebook likes and 295 tweets but comments for the page are locked.
I also found a report on the Examiner from January 5, 2012. And they have a quote from Obama but it does not reveal much. It is not incriminating.

“While my administration intends to keep the Congress fully informed of the status of U.S. efforts to cooperate with the Russian Federation on ballistic missile defense, my administration will also interpret and implement section 1244 in a manner that does not interfere with the president’s constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs and avoids the undue disclosure of sensitive diplomatic communications," he said, citing the incorrect section of the law.

Joel B. Pollack of Big Peace notes:

In the pursuit of a thirty-year-old leftist grudge against President Ronald Reagan’s policy of “peace through strength,” Obama has now apparently suggested his willingness to give away a technological edge eagerly coveted by Russia and especially by China.
There can be no stronger case for replacing Barack Obama in November.

The reporting of this issue is very thin at best. If that truly is the case which it appears to be, why? Why are so few news organizations willing to report on this issue? Is it a non-issue? And the only one authoritative media source reporting on the issue (Fox) has blocked comments from their page.
Now you will find stories about this topic on other websites but all they do is quote the original Washington Times story (like I have).
Now I ask. What is going on? Is this just a non-issue? Are we making a mountain out of a mole hill? I don't know but I hope that it becomes more publicly known now that Dick Morris is reporting on it.
Now I beg of all of you to read all of the references I posted on this page and also to go back to Facebook and share this article with your friends. Not because we acknowledge these as fact but because we want more awareness on the issue.

Obama Budget Voted Down 414-0

3/30/12
You won't hear the news media telling it like it is. But the Washington Times did. Obama's budget is an utter failure, not one house member voted for it. Not even a single Democrat.
Critics will spin it, if pressed. They will say something like "the Democrats knew Republicans would vote against it so they just voted no". Yes but there is a reason for that. They know Obama's budget is full of more debt busting policies that they don't want to go out on a limb and be associated with.
Even the Bowles-Simpson plan failed to pass the House. They are the bipartisan deficit reduction committee Obama created to avoid a debt default last August. It was shot down 382-38.
So Obama's solution to the debt limit debate was to create this deficit reduction committee. And their proposal could only muster 38 votes in the House. LOL.