Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Elect Leah Lax for President: Hey buddy can you spare $15 Trillion to give to O...

Elect Leah Lax for President: Hey buddy can you spare $15 Trillion to give to O...: Hey buddy can you spare $15 Trillion to give to Obama and his spending?After all it's only for a few months and I'll be glad to pay you...

Hey buddy can you spare $15 Trillion to give to Obama and his spending?

Hey buddy can you spare $15 Trillion to give to Obama and his spending?After all it's only for a few months and I'll be glad to pay you back in hamburgers.

Hogwash... Remove Obama now in the Primary Vote for Leah Lax visit her website and sign her petition at WWW.LeahLax.com If you can donate to her campaign

GOP blasts president as debt reaches $15T

By Erik Wasson - 11/16/11 03:54 PM ET

The national debt surpassed $15 trillion for the first time on Wednesday, according to the Treasury Department, and Republicans are seizing on the occasion to pin the blame on President Obama.

“America has crossed an unthinkable threshold: our national debt now exceeds $15 trillion dollars. That’s more than $48,000 per citizen," Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Reince Priebus said. “In 2009, President Obama promised to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term. Instead, he further accelerated its growth, producing three years of record deficits."

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-Va.) pointed out that $4.4 trillion in debt had been added since Obama took office.

"Our skyrocketing debt burden is not just bad luck; it is the predictable outcome of President Obama’s policies," Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) said.

While Republicans point out that Obama added $800 billion to the debt through his 2009 stimulus package, Democrats say the best way to solve the budget problem is to let the Bush-era tax rates expire. They also note that Obama inherited a recession when he came into office and that the recession lowered incoming tax revenue.

Elect Leah Lax for President: Oh Obama!

Elect Leah Lax for President: Oh Obama!: Obama You better watch out You better not cry I'm going to tell you why Orly Taitz is coming to New Hampshire. Orly made her list and she te...

Oh Obama!

Obama You better watch out You better not cry I'm going to tell you why Orly Taitz is coming to New Hampshire. Orly made her list and she tell it loud So Obama go run away from this crowd. Orly Taitz is coming to New Hampshire. She know you are a liar. She knows you are a fake, She knows you lied on the social security so step down for Goodness sake.
Go to Leah Lax's web page and registered your vote on her petition to get her on the ballot of your state. That's www.leahlax.com and donate to remove Obama.

CERTIFIGATE

Wow! New Hampshire wakes up to Obama's alleged Social Security fraud ...

Hearing Friday as state lawmakers also probe president's eligibility

Posted: November 16, 2011
8:43 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh

A hearing, with the apparent support of two state lawmakers, is scheduled before the New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission to hear a complaint filed by Orly Taitz that alleges Barack Obama has used fraudulent documents and a fraudulentSocialSecuritynumber.

The hearing is scheduled Friday at 2 p.m. in Room 307 of the New Hampshire Legislative Office Building, and Taitz is encouraging the public to be present.

The state holds the first presidential primary Jan. 10, 2012.

On her website, Taitz said state Rep. Harry Accornero had said he was joining in her complaint, and she expects Rep. Larry Rappoport also to be in attendance. The lawmakers could not be reached immediately for comment.

"Let's hope the elections board of New Hampshire will have the decency to refuse [to allow] Obama to appear on the ballot due to undeniable evidence of him using a stolen [Connecticut Social Security Number] … and due to the fact that he is using a computer generated forgery instead of a validbirthcertificate," Taitz wrote.

Jerome Corsi's New York Times best-seller, "Where's the Birth Certificate?", which addresses Obama's Social Security Number, is now available for immediate shipping, autographed by the author, only from the WND Superstore

She noted that the election code in the state contains a statement that requires a candidate to swear to his qualification to be president pursuant to Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 of the United States Constitution, which states, "No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of theadoptionof this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of president."

Taitz has been involved in a long list of high-profile cases over the past few years that have challenged Obama's eligibility under the Constitution's requirement that the president be a natural-born citizen. Some believe that means a birth in the United States, and they doubt the validity of the image of a Hawaiian Certificate of Live Birth that Obama released in April.

Others say natural-born means both parents must be citizens at the time of the birth. Under that standard, Obama could not qualify, because hisfatherwas a student in the U.S. but not a citizen.

The complaint alleges that Obama is ineligible because "he never provided anydocumentaryevidence of his natural born status."

Further, "The most staggering evidence is Mr. Obama's lack of a valid Social Security number and his use of a fraudulently obtained Social Security number from the state of Connecticut, a state where he never resided, which was never assigned to Obama, according to E-Verify," the complaint states.

It alleges not only is the Obama birth documentation a modern printout, there are numerous experts who attest it is fraudulent.

"Taitz received an affidavit from scanning machines expert Douglas Vogt. … It shows further evidence of forgery, such as different types of ink used. Some of the document shows as gray scale scanning, some as black and white scanning, some color. It shows different types of letters and kerning … numerous other parameters lead to the same conclusion, that the document in question is not a copy of a 1961 type written document, but a computer generated forgery, created by cutting and pasting bits and pieces from different documents and filling in the blanks with computer graphics," the document explains.

"Obama does not have an valid identification papers, which are necessary to be a candidate on the ballot, running for the U.S. presidency, based upon New Hampshire elections law 655-17 and on Article 1, section 2 of the U.S. Constitution," Taitz wrote.

"This case shows an unprecedented level of corruption and lawlessness in thefederalgovernmentand in the government of Hawaii, which allowed Obama to get on the ballot in 2008. … Petitioner demands removal of Obama from the ballot in the state of New Hampshire in the Democratpartyprimary and demands immediate criminal prosecution of Obama and his accomplices for elections fraud, common law fraud and uttering of forged documents."

Meanwhile, Sheriff Joe Arpaio of Maricopa County in Arizona has assigned a special cold case team to investigate the possibility that Obama could use fraudulent documents to apply for the Arizona ballot next year.

He's said the investigators have accumulated thousands of pages of evidence and his report likely will come early in 2012.

Elect Leah Lax for President: Shame on you Obama Shame on you!

Elect Leah Lax for President: Shame on you Obama Shame on you!: Shame on you Obama Shame on you! Step down with your corrupt friends. Sign the Petition on Leah Lax's website www.Leahlax.com Make histor...

Shame on you Obama Shame on you!

Shame on you Obama Shame on you! Step down with your corrupt friends.
Sign the Petition on Leah Lax's website www.Leahlax.com Make history in throwing out the first fake and worst President this country ever had, Donate to remove Obama and clean this country up. Republicans give you Pie in the Sky promises and you end up with nothing but Words. Just Words

Sen. Sessions: 'Deeply Disturbed' Over Kagan's Role in Obamacare

Wednesday, 16 Nov 2011 01:20 PM

By Martin Gould

More ways to share...

Republican pressure is growing for Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan to step down from the vital hearing that will decide the future of America’s healthcare next year.

Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions is leading the charge saying that newly released emails seem to show that Kagan was heavily involved in policy discussions on how to make sure Obamacare passed through Congress.

Now Sessions is putting pressure on embattled Attorney General Eric Holder – who, at the time was Kagan’s boss – to come clean on what she knew and when she knew it.

Sessions, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee, told Holder he is “deeply disturbed,” that the emails were not released at Kagan’s confirmation hearings in June last year.

Kagan is responsible for making the decision whether she should recuse herself from the case when the Supreme Court hears challenges to President Barack Obama’s signature law next spring. A decision on the constitutionality of the law is expected by late June or July, just in time for the two political parties’ National Conventions.

She has to decide whether her role as Obama’s Solicitor General at the time the law was drawn up and passed could be seen as an unacceptable conflict of interest. The law says, “Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.”

It goes on to say they should also quit a case “where he has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party.”

Sessions, who was attorney general of Alabama before he took his seat in the Senate in 1997, fired off a letter to Holder on Tuesday, demanding written testimony on why the emails were not presented before.

“I am deeply disturbed by these developments and believe that the Justice Department should have provided these documents to the Senate Judiciary Committee during Justice Kagan’s confirmation hearing,” he wrote.

“The Department’s failure to provide this information to Congress … as well as your apparent inattention to these matters, is unacceptable.”

In the emails, Kagan expresses her delight that the act was passing through Congress and is kept up to date with its progress.

In perhaps the most damaging email chain from January 2010, two weeks before Obamacare was passed by the Senate, Brian Hauck, the senior counsel to Associate Attorney General Tom Perelli wrote to Kagan’s deputy Neal Katyal, saying that Perelli wanted “to put together a group to get thinking about how to defend against the inevitable challenges to the health care proposals that are pending.”

Katyal immediately replied, “Absolutely right on. Let’s crush them. I’ll speak to Elena and designate someone,” and forwarded Hauck’s email to Kagan with a note saying, “I am happy to do this if you are ok with it.”

Within minutes Kagan responded, “You should do it.” And Katyal, who went on to become acting solicitor general after Kagan was elevated to the Supreme Court, emailed Hauck saying, “Brian, Elena would definitely like OSG (Office of the Solicitor General) to be involved in this set of issues.”

He told Hauck “I will handle this myself,” along with an assistant “and will bring in Elena as needed.”

Kagan has said that she first became aware that she was being considered as a potential Supreme Court justice on March 5, 2010. Seventeen days later the House of Representatives passed Obamacare and she sent an email to Justice Department adviser Laurence Tribe saying, “I hear they have the votes, Larry!! Simply amazing.”

Holder told the Senate Justice oversight committee that he recalled instances in which staff members would “physically, literally move” Kagan out of the room when Obamacare was being discussed. During her confirmation hearings she said her involvement in the matter was limited to one meeting where the matter came up briefly.

Another conservative who thinks Kagan has a conflict of interest in the case is Newt Gingrich , who told Newsmax.TV in an exclusive interview that she should step down from the case.
“It is unconscionable that a person who actually advised in the writing of Obamacare will now sit in judgment on what they help write," the presidential candidate said. “I think clearly Kagan should recuse herself. It’s clearly a conflict of interest, and I think a very bad judicial setting for her to now be rendering judgment on the bill she helped write.”

As to how the high court will rule in the case, Gingrich says: “You never quite know, but my hunch is that they are going to decide that it is unconstitutional to have a mandate” to buy health insurance.

If Kagan planned to recuse herself the court would normally have announced that she took no part in deliberations when it announced it would hear the case. On Monday the court docket showed that she had taken no part in several cases, but not the vital one “Florida et al vs. Department of Health and Human Services.”

The left has also called on conservative Justice Clarence Thomas to step down as his wife Virginia heads the lobbying group Liberty Central which has been at the forefront of challenges to Obamacare. He too has shown no sign that he will.

But the case against Thomas is not seen to be as strong as that against Kagan, who conservatives say helped craft the law’s defense.

Utah’s two Republican senators, Orrin Hatch and Mike Lee, have both questioned whether she should hear the case. And Louisiana GOP Rep. John Fleming said this week, “Before the Supreme Court case is heard, we need to know if Justice Elena Kagan helped the Obama administration prepare its defense for Obamacare when she was solicitor general.

“The Justice Department must answer serious questions about whether Justice Kagan has an inherent conflict of interest, which would demand that she recuse herself from the Obamacare case,” Fleming added.

But Russell Wheeler, visiting fellow at the Brookings Institute, told The Christian Post, “If she really thought her impartiality was compromised, she would step down.

“No justice wants to say that he or she didn’t have prior contact with the case only to be proven wrong in the near future. No Justice is going to try and pull a fast one, especially in today’s high tech society where the truth will eventually be found out.”

© Newsmax. All rights reserved.

Read more on Newsmax.com: Sen. Sessions: 'Deeply Disturbed' Over Kagan's Role in Obamacare
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!

Critics allege Elena Kagan is sympathetic to Sharia law

Published: 1:07 AM 08/05/2010 | Updated: 9:40 AM 08/06/2010

By Caroline May - The Daily Caller

Bio | Archive | Email Caroline May

Few fireworks erupted as the Senate opened up floor debate over Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan this week. Conventional wisdom remains that President Barack Obama’s second nomination to the high court will be confirmed with little trouble.
Despite the appearance of a fait accompli, numerous conservative groups have provided a wide range of reasons to oppose the Kagan nomination. Among the oft listed concerns are: her lack of experience, her perceived hostility to the military and free speech, her abortion and gay rights records, and her apparent reverence for foreign law. All these points have acted to obscure what some argue is one of her primary disqualifications — her sympathetic view of Sharia, or Islamic law.
Kagan’s detractors point to her time as the dean of Harvard Law School as the primary demonstration of her approval of Sharia. Andrew McCarthy, a senior fellow at the National Review Institute, wrote in an article on The National Review’s website that as Harvard Law School dean, Kagan “became the champion of sharia.”
Included in Kagan’s offensives as dean, according to McCarthy, was condoning the acceptance of $20 million from Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal — who blamed the attacks of 9/11 on American foreign policy — to fund programs on Islam. She also spearheaded the “Islamic Finance Project,” a program aimed at mainstreaming Sharia-compliant finance in America. And, as some point out, she awarded the Harvard Medal of Freedom to the chief justice of the Supreme Court of Pakistan, Iftikhar Chaudhry, who critics say is a promoter of Sharia.
Robert Spencer, the director of Jihad Watch, told The Daily Caller that Kagan would help advance Sharia law in America out of ignorance. “[Kagan] would knowingly and wittingly abet the advance of Sharia, but she wouldn’t do it understanding anything about Sharia. She would do it out of her ignorance.”
Spencer attributes Kagan’s fondness for Sharia to naïveté and liberalism. “There is a general tendency on the part of political liberals in the United States today to take a benign view of Islam and Islamic law,” he said. “They are generally uninformed and share a hatred of the West and Western civilization.”
According to Spencer, Kagan will be a willing accomplice in the ongoing stealth jihad — or the institution of Sharia into non-Muslim societies via non-violent means, such as the courts and mainstreaming Islamic customs — currently underway against the West. “The goal of the jihad is to assert the primacy of Islamic law over non-Muslim society and over Muslim societies where it is not fully enforced, and that can take place either through violent or non-violent means and the goal is the same,” he said.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/05/critics-allege-elena-kagan-is-sympathetic-to-sharia-law/#ixzz1dvBrxO21

The US senate voted 63 to 37 in favour of Kagan's appointment. Photograph: Alex Brandon/AP

Please remember the Senate was mostly Democrats at the time she was voted in.

Elena Kagan More Favorable to Islam and Sharia Law Than U.S. Military

By Bob Ellis on June 18th, 2010

I know: since when did we expect liberals to be consistent?

Still, it strikes me as rather odd that President Obama’s U.S. Supreme Court nominee Elena Kagan would try to bar military recruiters and ROTC from the Harvard campus over the the fact that homosexual conduct is considered incompatible with military service, yet would welcome a center for Islamic studies (and $20 million) from Saudi Arabian Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz.

The astute observer of history and current events will note that Islam and Sharia Law is not only extremely harsh toward homosexuality (as it is harsh toward pretty much everything under the sun), as well as treats women like mongrel dogs.

From Fox News:

On Wednesday, during a speech on the Senate floor, Sen. Jeff Sessions, R-Ala., ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, noted Harvard University accepted a $20 million gift from Saudi Arabian Prince Alwaleed Bin Talal Bin Abdulaziz in 2005 that was used to establish a center for Islamic Studies in his honor.

Sessions cited an Obama State Department report that noted that homosexual acts are a crime in Saudi Arabia under Sharia law and punishable by death or flogging.

At around the same time the university was accepting the gift, Kagan, as dean of the Harvard Law School, was actively seeking to exclude military recruiters from the campus for banning gays from serving openly in the military.

“Ms. Kagan was perfectly willing to obstruct the U.S. military – which has liberated countless Muslims from the hate and tyranny of Saddam Hussein and the Taliban,” Sessions said. “But it seems she sat on the sidelines as Harvard created an Islamic Studies Center funded by – and dedicated to – foreign leaders presiding over a legal system that violates what would appear to be her position.”

Perhaps $20 million speaks louder than her pro-homosexual principles.

Or perhaps it is simply more of that modern liberalism which, to be quite blunt, unfailingly embraces evil and shuns good. Modern liberalism always loathes America, American principles and values, American exceptionalism, and especially the U.S. military since it is the defense of all those values they despise.

We must remember, too, that liberals hold the doctrine of multiculturalism and the practice of appeasement in very high regard. In fact, appeasement of other cultures in preference over American principles and values is one of the highest acts of “righteousness” that can be performed on the Left.

So it makes a twisted sort of liberal sense that, while liberals would normally froth at the mouth over condemnation of homosexual conduct for the immoral and unhealthy behavior it is, and freak out at real or perceived sexism, the same or worse condemnation is to be ignored when done by a culture at odds with Americanism. Perhaps they consider Islam the lesser of two evils when compared to disgusting American values.

Figuring out liberals and trying to make sense of what they do is an ongoing challenge, but Lord willing, I’ll always be here to help.

Anyway, Kagan should answer for this double standard, because while her hypocrisy may make perfect sense on the Left, to real Americans, it makes no sense whatsoever. And Americans should not sit quietly while someone with such anti-America leanings is appointed to the nation’s highest court.

Elect Leah Lax for President: Do you believe in Magic? I don't

Elect Leah Lax for President: Do you believe in Magic? I don't: Do you believe in Magic? I don't . I don't believe that this man who happens to be a Latino shot at the White House without the White House...

Do you believe in Magic? I don't

Do you believe in Magic? I don't . I don't believe that this man who happens to be a Latino shot at the White House without the White House meaning Obama setting this up for a "I got shot at Pitty vote". And what gives it away everyone knows Obama and his Obamaette Miss Piggy Michelle is on another vacation. Maybe when he spoke about Transparency he was talking about this or this is a plot for gun control to strip the American people of owning guns and remove the 2nd amendment

As passed by the Congress:

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Obama will do anything to destroy the Constitution He would go as far as setting up this shooting. Does he think that the American People are that stupid. He did call us stupid for not voting for him, I must be right out dumb because I didn't vote for him in the Primary! Nor will I call him my President.
But wait now we are Lazy Stupid Americans, Guess only the Muslims are smart since he surrounds himself with Muslims Czars

Geees on that note. Vote Obama out in the Primary Elections, Sign Leah Lax's petition on www.LeahLax.com and donate. Help me help the USA and protect the Constitution

Suspect in Shooting Near White House Arrested in Pennsylvania

Published November 16, 2011

| FoxNews.com

WASHINGTON – The suspect wanted in connection with a shooting that occurred near the White House has been arrested in Pennsylvania, officials confirm.

The U.S. Secret Service said in a brief statement that Oscar Ortega-Hernandez was found by a Pennsylvania state trooper at a hotel near Indiana, Pa., shortly after noon on Wednesday. He is currently being held by the State Police

The arrest comes as officials continue to investigate the incident, after discovering bullets at or near the White House.

According to a Secret Service statement earlier Wednesday, law enforcement found one bullet that smashed a window at the White House before being stopped by a second layer of "ballistic glass." Another round was found outside the White House. The Secret Service said the damage "has not been conclusively connected" to the shooting.

"An assessment of the exterior of the White House is ongoing," the Secret Service said.

Fox News has learned that the FBI joined the investigation on Tuesday at the request of the Secret Service and U.S. Park Police. The FBI has extensive expertise in evidence gathering, which could explain why the agency was called in to assist.

Law enforcement for days had been searching for the suspect, 21-year-old Ortega-Hernandez. The suspect has a record of arrests in Idaho, Utah and Texas, according to MyFoxDC, and reportedly is believed to be mentally ill.

Park Police originally obtained an arrest warrant for Ortega-Hernandez after discovering an AK-47-style rifle in an abandoned car Friday night. The car was found after Secret Service officers heard shots being fired between two vehicles about a half-mile from the White House.

U.S. Park Police spokesman Sgt. David Schlosser said Sunday that officers had obtained an arrest warrant for the suspect on a felony charge of carrying a dangerous weapon, in connection with the incident.

President Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama were in California at the time of the shooting, before traveling to Hawaii for the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum.

News of the bullets' discovery broke shortly after the president landed in Australia for a brief 27-hour visit.

Fox News' Mike Levine and NewsCore contributed to this report.

Elect Leah Lax for President: 2012

Elect Leah Lax for President: 2012: If Obama is elected Remove Obama in the Primary Put Leah Lax on the Ballot by signing the petition below Visit www.LeahLax.com an...

2012

If Obama is elected

Remove Obama in the Primary

Put Leah Lax on the Ballot by signing the petition below

Visit www.LeahLax.com

and

Donate

We need your support

Elect Leah Lax for President: Organ Repo's next! Obama's plan for your organs

Elect Leah Lax for President: Organ Repo's next! Obama's plan for your organs: Obama not only wants the death tax enforced but will take your organs while you are alive by removing life support from you. Then harvesti...

Organ Repo's next! Obama's plan for your organs

Obama not only wants the death tax enforced but will take your organs while you are alive by removing life support from you. Then harvesting what the Government wants. This article below says the Government owns the organs before they harvest your love ones and you have no say as a relative in the matter. So if you match with a Senator liver because he drinks too much your organ goes to him not to a child who is dying of liver cancer. Who is more important a child or the elites? Wow Repo The Genetic Opera is becoming real.

Soon the Government will be charging for an organ and if you don't keep up the payments you liver, heart, eyes, etc will be returned to the Government by a Repo Medical man. Scary Huh?

Vote for Leah Lax to end this socialist crap. You own your body. End the death tax, the new law in harvesting organs and the future repo laws, Sign the petition and get me listed on the ballot of your state . This is a matter of life and death. visit www,leahlax.com and donate.

LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER

Latest Obama controversy: Who's ID'd as organ donor

Doctors warning changes would erase crucial line

Posted: November 15, 2011
8:47 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh

Logo used to promote organ donation

Officials running a federal program that is considering redefining death are going to be seeking further public comment after members of the Christian Medical Association raised alarms about several problems, including what they believe would be an open door to pressure families to donate organs before their loved one has died.
The proposal could move the federal government closer into alignment with what has been proposed by longtime Barack Obama adviser Cass Sunstein.
Obama's "regulatory czar" was revealed in 2009 to have pushed strongly for the removal of organs from those who did not give their consent to becoming an organ donor.
In his book, "Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness," Sunstein and co-author Richard Thaler presented the possibility of the "routine removal" of organs because "the state owns the rights to body parts of people who are dead or in certain hopeless conditions, and it can remove their organs without asking anyone's permission."
Re-creating mankind through genetics, robotics, brain machine interfacing, artificial intelligence, synthetic biology and nanotechnologies. Listen to the details, in "Something Transhuman This Way Comes."
"Though it may sound grotesque, routine removal is not impossible to defend," he wrote. "In theory, it would save lives, and it would do so without intruding on anyone who has any prospect for life."
He also has argued for presumed consent, the idea that anyone who has not left specific orders against organ donation is a voluntary contributor to the program, a plan that has been proposed in some state legislatures as recently as the last few years.
A spokeswoman for the the operators of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network told WND that a new round of public comments will be heard regarding the issue that the CMA said would allow those caring for critically ill patients to start considering them for their potential to donate organs while they remain alive.
"Gone [would be] the crucial wall separating patient care from donation solicitations," said a letter this week from the chief of the CMA. "Such undue influence on difficult decisions at a heart-wrenching time is ethically unacceptable."
The letter was from Dr. David Stevens, the CEO of the Christian Medical Association, to John Lake, the president of the OPTN, which is run under contract by a company called UNOS, the United Network for Organ Sharing.
At issue are proposed changes to various definitions and standards that the nationwide organ-donation coordination program uses.
The CMA said the first was the removal of an important stipulation "separating patient care from donation solicitations."

"Previously the hospital's primary healthcare team and the legal next of kin must have decided to withdraw ventilated support or other life-sustaining treatment before the patient may be evaluated as a DCD [donation after cardiac death] candidate," the letter warned.
"Under the proposed policy a patient may be evaluated as a DCD candidate prior to a decision by family members and caregivers, which ought to be free from external pressure."
The proposed language change specifically would instruct, "A potential DCD donor should be evaluated by the primary healthcare team and the local OPPO to determine if the candidate meets the following criteria:"
Those included irreversible disease or "end-stage musculoskeletal disease."
The changes also call for a plan for patient care "in the event that death does not occur within the established time period after the withdrawal of life-sustaining medical treatment or ventilated support."
And the proposed changes involve the deletion of a long section of guidelines on defining "irreversibility."
Those said that irreversibility is a "persistent cessation of function during an appropriate period of observation." It also says "donor death occurs when respiration and circulation have ceased and cardiopulmonary function will not resume spontaneously."
"The removal of the requirement of 'irreversibility' of cardiopulmonary cessation exposes patients to potential exploitation," the CMA letter said. "CMA is concerned that relaxing the definition of death would considerably increase the risk that procedures to remove vital organs would be performed on some patients lacking unambiguous signs that death has occurred. CMA is also concerned about the impact that publicized abuses of the new policy could have on the public's trust in transplant medicine and their willingness to volunteer as future organ donors," the CMA letter said.
A spokeswoman for the OPTN program said the organization would be distributing requests for comment and accepting those statements in preparation for consideration of the changes sometime during 2012.
Steven's letter also expressed that the "model elements" that previously had been recommended were to be made "mandatory," and further, "The proposed requirements broaden donor criteria to include patients without cognitive neurological injury. As physicians, we are greatly concerned that patients with chronic illnesses such as spinal cord injury or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) would be vulnerable to real or perceived pressure to decline further treatment in order to donate their organs…" he continued.
"The unintended consequences of the proposed requirements would be antithetical to the ethical practice of medicine. By loosening previous stricter guidelines, by eliminating vital safeguards and by failing to clarify key criteria, the proposed requirements signal that hospitals and healthcare professionals can now relax ethical concerns and safeguards in favor of pursuing a utilitarian 'higher good' of obtaining a greater number of organs for transplant," the CMA letter said.
"We believe that such a change in emphasis, however subtle, would erode the ethical practice of medicine by promoting a culture of utilitarianism or casualness regarding life and death decisions," the statement said.
"If physicians conscientiously opposed to such policies were forced to retire from the practice of critical care medicine rather than participate in them, society would lose many dedicated, skilled and compassionate caregivers."
The government proposal makes clear its intentions: "The proposed changes will help to maximize the number of donors and transplants by identifying the currently unrealized donor potential."
The doctors' concern, however, was found a few pages later: "A controlled Donation after Circulatory Death donor is a donor whose life support will be withdrawn and whose family has given written consent for organ donation in the controlled environment of the operation room."

Read more: Latest Obama controversy: Who's ID'd as organ donor http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=368257#ixzz1dszWwkbH

Elect Leah Lax for President: So much for freedom of expression

Elect Leah Lax for President: So much for freedom of expression: Obama and his men of Facebook want NICE pictures of Obama. No chunky cankles of Michelle No thunder thighs just pretty pictures of Obama and...

So much for freedom of expression

Obama and his men of Facebook want NICE pictures of Obama. No chunky cankles of Michelle No thunder thighs just pretty pictures of Obama and his Obamanettes.
This is the picture they removed

Elect Leah Lax for President: Obama made the USA to be COWARDS

Elect Leah Lax for President: Obama made the USA to be COWARDS: Obama made the USA to be COWARDS #3187 - Iranian Deputy Chief-of-Staff Brig.-Gen Masoud Jazayeri Calls Upon OWS Movement to Denounce US Th...

Obama made the USA to be COWARDS

Obama made the USA to be COWARDS
#3187 - Iranian Deputy Chief-of-Staff Brig.-Gen Masoud Jazayeri Calls Upon OWS Movement to Denounce US Threats to Iran and States: An Israeli Attack on Iran's Nuclear Installations Would Lead to "Total Annihilation of That Entity"; The Dimona Nuclear Plant Is the Easiest Target
Al-Alam TV (Iran) - November 9, 2011 - 06:56

#3195 - Syrian Political Scientist Jamal Al-Mahmoud Calls upon Iran to Mobilize Shiites in Saudi Arabia, and States: The Syrian Army Should "Use Violence against These Armed Groups and Finish Them Off"
Al-Dunya TV (Syria) - November 12, 2011 - 01:47

#3185 - Sonja Al-Rassi, Daughter of Former Lebanese President Suleiman Faranjieh: The Americans Carried Out 9/11 and Told the Japanese on Which Day to Attack Pearl Harbor
OTV (Lebanon) - October 23, 2011 - 01:53

#3186 - Trailer of Newly-Released Antisemitic Iranian Feature Film in Which Jews Build War Machine to Take Over the World
The Internet - November 8, 2011 - 02:31

This clip shows it the hate for the Jew not the Zionist.

visit www.lorettamiller4president.com

Wednesday, November 16, 2011

Elect Leah Lax for President: Hey buddy can you spare $15 Trillion to give to O...